Biden makes appearance on 'Late Night with Seth Meyers' for interview

https://lemmy.world/post/12465183

Biden makes appearance on 'Late Night with Seth Meyers' for interview - Lemmy.World

Biden appeared almost 10 years to the day after he was a guest on the first “Late Night” show with Meyers when he was vice president in 2014. President Joe Biden made an appearance Monday on “Late Night with Seth Meyers,” where he answered questions about topics ranging from his age and the Israel-Hamas war to the conservative conspiracy about Taylor Swift. The interview comes almost 10 years to the day after Biden was a guest on the first “Late Night” show with Meyers, which aired on Feb. 24, 2014, when Biden was vice president. It also follows a decision this month to skip a Super Bowl interview that had a much larger audience. During Monday’s Q&A, Biden was asked early on how he addresses voter concern over his age. “Take a look at the other guy, he’s about as old as I am," said Biden, who at 81 is four years older than former President Donald Trump. “It’s about how old your ideas are. Look, I mean, this is a guy who wants to take us back,” Biden added, pointing to Trump’s positions on abortion rights, which he suggested were outdated.

“It’s about how old your ideas are. Look, I mean, this is a guy who wants to take us back,” Biden added, pointing to Trump’s positions on abortion rights, which he suggested were outdated.

Biden saying this is a joke

He is Catholic and Roe versus Wade happened on Biden’s watch

Did not even try an executive order or anything

His ideas are old as well just look at his other policies such as his and prosecutor Kamala’s outdated cannabis stance

Yeah, he absolutely should have replaced the supreme Court judges trump placed that made the ruling! Or at least he should have ordered them to rule differently by executive order!
Maybe he should have pushed for something to happen when he happen to be VP during a super majority 🤔

Why didn’t he, as VP, push to legalize something that was already legal and viewed as settled law when the president was focused on the ACA during the, what was it, like 2 weeks they had a super majority?

Come on man.

Except that it wasn’t and the Republicans had been talking about attacking it since Regan.

You mean they had been using it to raise money and get people to the polls for 30 years but no one thought they were dumb enough to actually overturn it.

There were more pressing issues at the time.

Yesnprecisely. It had been part of their platform for THIRTY YEARS, and those THIRTY YEARS, including TWO super majority none of them Dems thoughts “you know, maybe we should make sure it doesn’t happen.”

Ok, what’s your solution then? Because 1 of 2 people are going to be president in February of 2025 and one of them actually appointed the judges responsible for the decision while the other one didn’t do enough to stop it (in your opinion) while he was VP.

Surely the leopard won’t eat my face!

Not sure you understand that expression if you think it applies here. I certainly didn’t vote for anyone who was in favor of overturning Roe.

That’s the problem with you people, you are convinced that electoral politics is the only way to affect change, when it really is one of the least effective ways.

Oh fuck off, nobody believes you’re about to overthrow the government.

One of the least effective ways, second only to crying about it on the Internet I suppose.

I suppose you’re not a big fan of the American Revolution then.
I just don’t think you’re about to overthrow the government from your mom’s basement. But go ahead and prove me wrong, I suppose.
And here we go with the ad hominem, we always end up stopping so low with cultists like you.

Removed, rule 3:

“Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”