Trump ally Charlie Kirk suggests children should watch public executions

https://lemmy.world/post/12354956

Trump ally Charlie Kirk suggests children should watch public executions - Lemmy.World

“Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation…What age should you start to see public executions?” Kirk asked. Kirk, along with his co-hosts Jack Posobiec, Tyler Bowyer and Blake Neff, continued to discuss at what age should children watch the public executions, with one co-host pointing out as young as 12 years old.

let’s desensitize them to violence as early as possible, WCGW.

/s

It's how he was raised, and he turned out fine!
We can’t let kids see gay things! But watching someone get murdered is totally cool.
America is a country of violent prudes. There’s a reason we rate violent movies lower than movies with “sexual content”.

Yep. Beheading where the head flies all over the place? No problem, 12+.

Hint of a single tit? Freakout, 18+!

I wonder what a flying tit would be rated at.
Pg13 has gone off the rails since I was a kid. Like on-camera gun suicides with chunks, among other things. Meanwhile half the R films I watch don’t even have blood anymore blood. Basically pg13 means high violence and R means the tiniest hint that something sexual could maybe happen off screen. I don’t get it at all
You’re forgetting language. Cursing is treated nearly the same as sexual content. Throw a couple fucks in and the movie is rated R even without violence or sexual content.
I don’t have any fucks left to throw.
I went out fuck shopping and there’s no fucks left to buy!
Right one fuck is pg-13, R is 2 or more.

I think it’s gotten even more weird because there seems to be a certain brand of feminism (lost track of which wave is anti-porn, and not sure if this is the same group - but, honestly, it’s hard to distinguish the outcome from conservative busybodies, if you are going to be honest) seem to go on and on about the “male gaze”, so even things like slashers don’t have bewbs in them. I guess so they get a PG-13 ratiing even though they may have quite a bit of violence in them (but no T&A, by god!)

These are the same people that harped on things like Game of Thrones, too, for showing bewbs and sometimes a bit of pubes - but apparently being ultraviolent was not a problem.

That Puritan founding. Funny hats make you crazy.
Funny hats were made with mercury that makes you crazy: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_as_a_hatter
Mad as a hatter - Wikipedia

A country founded by prudes… according to Eurotrip.
A country where a man is forced to make sex to only one woman at a time and one must learn the woman’s name beforehand!
What? Polyamory is very popular here, especially among men in my area. They're just on the DL with it instead of living authentically.
It’s a quote from Eurotrip which the person I was responding to referenced.
Rofl! I don't have TV or subscribe to services, hence my confusion. Thanks for the explanation, I am wearing a stupid-wide grin!

Well, they need to be shown the consequences of what happens if you do gay things, of course.

If Trump gets back in and they implement that “Project 2025” where they plan to fire 50k government workers and replace them with far right wingnuts, I can envision such a future. Alito just signaled that they’re not satisfied with just overturning Roe, he’s gunning to overturn Obergefel. I wonder which states it’ll be illegal for me to exist in, soon.

It's a death cult.
Bunch of psychopaths
Yes, Christianity is an apocalyptic death cult.
Abrahamic faiths all worship the God of death.
Didn’t Trump just claim video games being too violent are to blame for mass violence? Is this guy a Trump ally or just one of the multitude of ignoranus (not a mistake, it’s a contraction of stupid and asshole) GOP members?
The flaw in your logic is that you expect the GOP to have any amount of consistency in their own logic.
George Carlin called it. Maybe they need to put it on pay-per-view to balance the budget.

Wait,

his wiki says he's against the death penalty?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Kirk

Charlie Kirk - Wikipedia

The foot note on that page links to this interview from 2019. The only comment in the interview about the death penalty is. “I don’t agree with the president on the death penalty, I don’t agree with him on marijuana, I don’t agree with him on Saudi Arabia, there are things I don’t agree with, but that doesn’t mean I should be less enthused about what he’s doing to revitalize the country.” Trump is, and was at the time, very much pro-death penalty.

There is no detail at all or follow up question and I can’t find any other source suggesting that Kirk used to be anti-death penalty. Either this was a misstatement or he has completely reversed his position. It’s not something he is saying facetiously. You can see the clip here.

GOP Darling Charlie Kirk is Worried About Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, but He's Got a Plan

"I'm worried about her ideas. She's nothing more than the symptom of a broken culture," Charlie Kirk said of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Newsweek
They already do. It’s called school shootings. They have drills and everything. It’s quite fucked up.
We should start with Charlie Kirk.
I would MUCH rather my Children watch a Public Execution then watch two MEN hold HANDS!
Why does the order of events matter so much to you?
I guarantee this comment gets reported because Lemmy can’t sarcasmm
I think this is a bad idea because American media tends to make everything absurd. There’d be top ten count downs and behind the scenes specials… They’d probably get a UFC style announcer… Maybe do a cribs show… How to cook the final meals competition. “So I married a executioner” TV special. Real wives of prisoners and prison officers special.
Bro that’s what they want. These people are axe murders who want to find a way to do it without being shunned by society.
Think “what would ancient rome do?” that’s what they really want, they are fascists.
They could do that knife-making show for guillotine blades. You really don’t want to get the screw-up contestant when it’s your turn on the block.
literally starship troopers
“Are you doing your part?”
Starship Troopers Propaganda

YouTube

It’s always projection with GOP. They are only behaving morally because they believe they will be punished by God / society of they don’t. Meaning they have little to no moral compass beyond potential punishment.

So naturally crime would go down as kids are scared into submission early on. Brazier everybody has the same moral behaviour as them…

They should rename CPAC to DegenCon
They could make it a game show, and call it “The Running Man”.
“This is television, that’s all it is. It has nothing to do with people, it’s to do with ratings! For fifty years, we’ve told them what to eat, what to drink, what to wear… for Christ’s sake, Ben, don’t you understand? Americans love television. They wean their kids on it. Listen. They love game shows, they love wrestling, they love sports and violence. So what do we do? We give 'em what they want! We’re number one, Ben, that’s all that counts, believe me. I’ve been in the business for thirty years.”
Who are these primitive but bags?
But not sex ed - makes perfect sense.
Charlie Kirk needs a beshaving to make his face the right size.
Ok can we start with his?
The rise of the techno barbarians.
If your goal is to make everyone traumatized and live in fear of the government from a young age, then sure
That’s exactly the goal

The irony is that these people always talk about “small government” and go on and on about “freedom”.

But yeah, let’s have public executions and have children watch them…SMH.

They know they have to normalize public execution before they can openly hang the disobedient handmaids on the wall.

More ideas from the Taliban playbook.

Remember kids, a boy is a boy and a girl is a girl, and three witnesses saw Katie get raped so we’re going to stone her to death!

I mean, petty crime is almost non-existent in Saudi Arabia. Their system of punishment is horrible, but it seems to be effective in at least some manner. I wonder if regular and public reminders of the punishment for certain crimes would do more of a deterrent than just the threat of years of incarceration.
At what cost to society?