Neither the NY Times or the Washington Post reported Trump's statement that he would encourage Russia to attack NATO on the front page.
Both managed to find room for missives on Biden's age & memory.
And they're completely flummoxed as to why journalism is dying...
@tmstreet c'mon, man. I'm referring to the front page of the print version. You know, the image that is attached.
JFC.
@sfdb @tmstreet
You seem to be pushing an agenda here. Why?
It's the number two story on the online NYT, which vastly more people read. It's the number one AND number two story on the online Washington Post.
Maybe the story missed the deadline for the front page? Maybe you got the early Sunday edition to make a dishonest point? I don't know. But you're twisting the facts, that's 100% clear.
@taoish @tmstreet Respectfully, you're referring to the landing page of the website. I was referring to the front page pf the print paper. I actually provided you with a copy of the image I was referring to.
I have no agenda and it wasn't a dishonest point. The papers did not include the story on the front page of their print papers. You can agree that it's a significant point or not but there was no agenda being pushed.
Calling the online front page of these papers "the landing page" makes no sense, and again seems deliberately misleading. What percentage of NYT and WaPo readers have a paper copy? 10% maybe?
The online version IS the paper to the vast majority of readers. It is the front page. I don't know where you got your images but respectfully, they don't matter much and are very misleading.
sfdb
climate voter/degrowthist
Mark Saltveit