There are many days that I get disheartened about graphs being too complex to use as an interchange format. My world (structured data at Google) revolves around graphs but humans just have a lot of problems reasoning about higher dimensional data. Sometimes I think trees are about as far as the average person can handle intuitively.

I can easily point to all the advantages in composability, lack of redundancy, etc. but if you can't picture it easily in your mind it makes it hard to work with.

@rrlevering interesting point. Are there thought exercises or practices you think helps folks train themselves to conceptualise more complex structures? (Perhaps some kind of tuple tiktok lifehack popular with the youth 😀. There could be a dance and everything)

Or do you think it's really more just a case of some folks getting it, some folks don't?

@dwsmart I think some people think more visually and have an advantage....and maybe if you stare at enough graphs you learn it.
@rrlevering stare until it clicks is often the way I learn stuff.