Should an earth-shrouding network of low orbit satellites be something that can be privately owned? How many people would be as blithe about the sky & light pollution if it were owned by IDK antifa or Iran or whatever seems scary to you?

I feel like we failed to have a required conversation. The sky belongs to everyone. No one asked me if I wanted this, no one asked you.

Speaking of moving fast, breaking things … how hard would it be to shoot them down? If it is illegal to do so, why?

@futurebird The good news is that they can't stay up there for particularly long. They're up around 600km, I think, which is somewhere in the "five years or so" part of the curve for orbital lifespan. We could stop him putting any more up today, and most of them would be evaporated on re-entry before the 2028 election is decided.

EDIT: on review, it seems there's a possible order-of-magnitude mess going on with this claim, and it could be multiple decades. And there's also a large amount of "needs to be actively de-orbited" situations in the middle of all that, so you know, feel free to keep being furious!

@spacehobo @futurebird Thought so too, But sadly they are in an Orbit (550-600km) that is ever so slighty higher than „5 years orso“. A difference of ~150km in height however is one order of magnitude in lifetime.
The whole concept seems not well thought out in the long run and overconfident in many aspects. Especially the part where deorbiting is something that will have to happen with assistance from the satellite and for that, each satellites' thrusters will have to be in working condition.
@nblr @spacehobo @futurebird
How about at 284,000 km? I want to know when the moon is going to come crashing down. j/k
@SSSam Miles? There are no miles in space.