Please boost FREE community #fediscience!
LIVE and ZOOM, all welcome!

TONIGHT!!
Tues Jan 9, 6:30pm (London time) we start our Spring Term with #CamillaPower on
'Egalitarianism made us human. Why Graeber and Wengrow get it wrong'

LIVE
@UCLanthropology 2nd Floor Daryll Forde Seminar Room, 14 Taviton St. London WC1H 0BW

Everyone welcome to just turn up or join on ZOOM
Details
http://radicalanthropologygroup.org/blog/egalitarianism-made-us-human-why-graeber-and-wengrow-get-it-wrong/

#egalitarianism #huntergatherers #DawnofEverything #intersubjectivity #language #encephalization #collectivechildcare

Egalitarianism made us human: why Graeber and Wengrow get it wrong – Radical Anthropology Group

Camilla writes: “‘The world of hunter-gatherers… was one of bold social experiments’ say Graeber and Wengrow, ‘..a carnival parade of political forms’. But did the boldest social experiments of our ancestors – language and symbolic culture – constrain these possibilities?

Aspects of our anatomy, psychology and cognition that were necessary preadaptations to language – cooperative eyes, intersubjectivity, large brains, a ratchet effect of cultural accumulation – required stable sociopolitical contexts of significant egalitarianism to evolve among our Middle Pleistocene ancestors. This implies political strategies for minimizing and periodically nullifying dominance relations, through dynamics of day-to-day individualistic counter-dominance with occasional displays of collective reverse dominance. Because of the very high costs for mothers who had to provide high quality nutrition and reliable allocare for large-brained babies, the most telling aspect of this would be gender resistance, establishing gender egalitarianism. Middle Pleistocene populations with more hierarchical tendencies were least likely to have become language-speaking, larger-brained ancestors of Homo sapiens.”

image shows Hadza women in their dry season camp at Sekobe.

This talk will be given by Camilla Power (Research Fellow in Anthropology at UCL), LIVE on Tue Jan 9, 6:30pm in the Daryll Forde Seminar Room, 2nd Floor, Dept of Anthropology, UCL, 14 Taviton St WC1H 0BW.

You can also join on ZOOM with ID 384 186 2174 passcode Wawilak.

Recording from Jan 9,
#CamillaPower on
'Egalitarianism made us human: why Graeber and Wengrow get it wrong'

https://vimeo.com/901461872?share=copy

Egalitarianism made us human: why Graeber and Wengrow get it wrong, by Camilla Power 9/1/23

Vimeo

@RadicalAnthro ⬆️ this talk was amazing, at covering same questions I had about that book, and more !
this relation of "politics" to physical evolutionary elements is essential, as well as to put women where they belong : the center

(when as a book? ;)

side note : I remembered having seen this study of wolf eye colors re social structure and communication in the pack https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0098217

A Comparison of Facial Color Pattern and Gazing Behavior in Canid Species Suggests Gaze Communication in Gray Wolves (Canis lupus)

As facial color pattern around the eyes has been suggested to serve various adaptive functions related to the gaze signal, we compared the patterns among 25 canid species, focusing on the gaze signal, to estimate the function of facial color pattern in these species. The facial color patterns of the studied species could be categorized into the following three types based on contrast indices relating to the gaze signal: A-type (both pupil position in the eye outline and eye position in the face are clear), B-type (only the eye position is clear), and C-type (both the pupil and eye position are unclear). A-type faces with light-colored irises were observed in most studied species of the wolf-like clade and some of the red fox-like clade. A-type faces tended to be observed in species living in family groups all year-round, whereas B-type faces tended to be seen in solo/pair-living species. The duration of gazing behavior during which the facial gaze-signal is displayed to the other individual was longest in gray wolves with typical A-type faces, of intermediate length in fennec foxes with typical B-type faces, and shortest in bush dogs with typical C-type faces. These results suggest that the facial color pattern of canid species is related to their gaze communication and that canids with A-type faces, especially gray wolves, use the gaze signal in conspecific communication.