40 Years Later, Nintendo's Famicom Is Still Ahead Of Its Time
40 Years Later, Nintendo's Famicom Is Still Ahead Of Its Time
I get the sentiment, but I have to disagree. The thought just doesn’t hold up.
Galileo: ahead of his time. His suggestions and thoughts have been surpassed now. He laid a foundation.
Tesla: ahead of his time. His inventions have either been surpassed or played out to infeasibility now.
The Palm Pilot: ahead of its time. It laid the road for Blackberry, then the iPhone and Android devices we use today.
Something can be ahead of its time, but that doesn’t mean it is unsurpassable.
You haven’t understood. OP is saying that something being ahead of its time isn’t a function of how much time has passed since. It will always remain ahead of its time. As stated, it is an intrinsic, rather than an extrinsic, property.
I agree, and especially in this case, but I can think of corner cases where “its time” gets fuzzier as time passes and expands to include more competition.
For example, the Compaq Presario 2100 seems to have been about the first PC with a price under USD$1000 - I remember that being a big deal at the time! … for a few months. Now it’s just a footnote that took me some Google-fu to find at all, but it was ahead of its time at the time and was a cover story on magazines.
Something can be ahead of its time, but that doesn’t mean it is unsurpassable.
I wasn’t saying it was unsurpassable. I was saying that “its time” was a fixed point in history, and if it was ahead of its time (aka. 1983), it will always be ahead of its time (1983).
The Famicom is definitely not ahead of the Switch, or even the N64. I’m sure someone could argue it was ahead of the SNES in some ways. Or anything else. But as a whole, it’s been surpassed a long time ago.