It’s a technical distinction in law. Is he guilty of the things of which he’s been accused? Also yes, but in a colloquial sense.
As far as the “allegedly” thing goes with the press: I’m kind of on the side with agreeing with it, just because I know that if I were wrongly accused of a crime that made it to the press, I know I would want them to use the word “allegedly” until it was actually proven. 
Ok, enough with the pedantry!
It’s a technical distinction in law.
No fucking shit, my point still stands.
No fucking shit, my point still stands
Actually, it doesn’t. It’s the difference between civil and criminal law, and that’s a pretty big difference, not the meaningless one you stated it is, and if this is going to go from a nice casual discussion to a hostile argument, I’m not interested in participating further. Have a nice day.
Well, look who’s back.
What part of the original commenter’s colloquial use of the word “guilty” did you not understand?
Outside the specific legal distinction, to the public at large, he’s guilty.
Do you need a picture drawn for you or something?
Well, look, who’s back.
This is where I stopped, reading your comment. Calm down, deal with your shit, and have a good night. 
Came back from a three day weekend to this.
So the guy who got pissy over a common phrase meaning “Thank you, Captain Obvious” says someone else should grow up LOL.
Next time you want to play the “so what is it you don’t understand about this” game, pick someone else to target, or make an attempt to understand yourself. Some of us actually don’t like that game at all, but we are very adept players.
Me: “No fucking shit.” You: “wahhhhhhh” storms off
Me: “Well, look who’s back.” You: “wahhhhhhh” storms off
Oh no, you might get mad, the least threatening thing on the internet.
The funny part is I’ve never been mad. I was vaguely annoyed the first time, then amused ever since. You’ve been mad. I’ve just replied and you’ve whined about it.
I’m sorry you’re too dumb to understand the nature of your own replies.
Same could be said for yourself, I already explained in the “Well look who’s back” reply where you misunderstood, but you were too much a bitch to read it, and probably still too incompetent to understand it.
The fact you lack the self-awareness to understand you’ve been trolling yourself with ignorance is quite amazing.
Got it, you cannot point to anything showing that I described myself.
Again, I have read everything, unlike yourself. I know exactly what’s going on. I’m not twisted on anything. I’ve made no declaration of not taking part.
You’re the delusional revisionist here, who lacks the self control to not reply, and the commitment to what you said you were going to not do. You’re doing nothing but projection, and anyone who actually reads the thread knows that.
I’m also enjoying the fact you cannot stop replying, and are apparently incapable of being honest about it.
I mean, you cried and left multiple times, then came back later and said someone else should grow up. That is the definition of projection.
Oddly enough, apparently if I keep responding, you’re also incapable of stopping yourself.
Which isn’t surprising, considering you demonstrated this lack of control to begin with.
several days ranting
Again, I left for three days, didn’t think about this at all. Replying to you back then and replying today doesn’t qualify as days of ranting, but I realize you have trouble with reading things. I’d wager you’re the one getting upset, because it is evident in your replies.
see, you still don’t realize that you’re not in an argument, so you can’t possibly win. i’m here to endlessly provoke your little rants and tantrums, and i’ll continue wasting your time and energy forver, and i have already won because you lack the self-control to stop.
it’s hilarious.
Strangely enough, that’s essentially the problem you had to begin with.
As said before, the reply “no fucking shit” was inherently an acknowledgment that there was a technical difference between liable and guilty, such as “no duh” or similar, but you continued arguing even though the point was acknowledged. You were arguing about something I wasn’t contesting. That is still the case, regardless how you’d prefer to remember it.
And you’re the one who kept coming back, and all these ad hominem attacks and denial are all you have left.
again, trying to blame me for your own shortcomings and action. weren’t you the one who brought up projection?
and why would i stop having fun by provoking you?