here we go!

AI counter within 2 sentences? 2

LMAO, freudian slip:

AI Error instead of Era

Ok so software devs are important to colab with: can haz software roadmap pweaze? 😻

Mi300X is "launching"

TF32 FP8, sparsity support on top of fp/bf16 and ofc int8

Dozen chiplets (including HBM stacks?)

4 io dies with vcache built in (!!!!)

8 GPU tiles

17TB/s mesh, 5.3 TB/s memory BW
ehhh properly calling the functions "kernels", big <3 to Lisa Sue and/or the script writers

Some AI inference benchmarks, kind of cool but not super shocking.

comparison with H100 (not surprising) but back of the envelop puts Mi300 as within a few dozen percentage points of H200 when both in an SPR host machine with 8x GPGPU

building the foundation of AI for "x" years? sure.

We've been waiting/working on them since the fifth gen language discussions of the 80 and 90's

DAT DENSITY

OCP compliant is pretty pog NGL

NGL a little surprised to see oracle at an AI thing with AMD of all folks

"Open, proven and ready" is one way to put ROCm 😬

Love you guys and galls, but I hard disagree with the claim

You can't claim it's FOSS and that you accept work from FOSS when you won't accept patches from anyone :/

ROCm 6: adds support for FP8 (which ones?)

Graph compiler is cool but not that new.

still good to see as long as it gets *delivered*

Software partners is good, running natively* with pytorch and requiring no code is also good.

native support for Mi300 in trident from OpenAI

Meh, how many times has "software" 2.0 been brought up?

first with high level langs, then run time langs etc.

will "Ai" change some parts of software developement, probably?

"reshape" the enterprise, maybe? but every "new" thing has changed some parts of the enterprise, question is always how much

Back to the real presentation

ROCm 6 is "SoonTM" (next year? next quarter? etc.)

@fclc @jplehr any comments about when ROCm 6 will be released?
@hattom @fclc I guess... when it's done.
I know that's not terribly helpful.