"So, I'm going to do something which may not be well-recieved: I'm going to push-back (slightly) on the Linked Data movement, because, frankly, I think it is a bit draconian with respect to the way it oversells the HTTP URI scheme"

https://archive.is/gtBty#selection-181.0-185.106

@bengo

I have long thought that http URI was a bit overused, and especially weird in cases where doesn't (and some times never did) point to an actual schema/ontology/etc or even a spec.

But I'm not informed enough to actually say anything about it, not that anyone would listen anyway. But nice to see others questioning it.

@Ailuridae :P yeah we gotta replace all those 'https:' with 'did:' and idk maybe some 'dweb:' :P
@Ailuridae (and esp replace the 'http:'. 'https' is fine)