You could, I suppose, argue that the 20th century produced worse villains than Kissinger, or that his motives were less personally corrupt than those of many of his peers.

But here's the thing. As an American, I must remember that Kissinger's crimes were done at least partly in my name. That the blood he spilled stains my own hands.

We must repudiate his legacy, or we will always remain complicit in it.

@mattblaze He had this argument that he was reality-based but in fact where he was most active he did the most harm. Iran's actions today in supporting terror are part of his legacy. His legacy is blood, death, and chaos. This idea that the "hard choices" must be made to engage in destruction instead of destabilization, as if chaos were better than a flawed order, should die with him.
@ljean @mattblaze
This is really important to bear in mind as we pick apart his rotten legacy. Yes, a lot of his crimes, like the slaughter of so many tens of thousands in Southeast Asia, were overt and directly traced to him. But he also wormed his way into the inner workings of regions all over the world, like South America as well, who are still suffering from his poison.
@jargoggles @mattblaze Thank you. I meant destruction instead of stabilization. Thank you for your patience and your thoughtful response.