The myth about the origin of the Nobel prizes is that when Nobel’s brother died, newspapers mistakingly thought the wealthy, warmongering arms dealer had died and the obituaries were so uniformly awful and condemning that he decided to do something to make sure he would be remembered for something other than his actions

So he made sure the Nobel prizes would be founded after his death

All of which is to say that celebrating when monsters finally die saves lives

So, mock them mercilessly

(I say ‘myth’ because there is some uncertainty on whether it’s actually true, but it’s a good story and as we say here in Iceland: “Hafa skal það sem hljómar betur.”)
se non è vero, è ben trovato - Wiktionary, the free dictionary

@threedaymonk Thanks! I didn’t know that 🙂
@baldur interesting. I recently shared that. So it’s not true?!

@rick It’s technically unconfirmed. Apparently the order of events is true. The mistaken obituaries followed by the announcement of the Nobel prizes, but there’s no documentation on whether the obituaries factored into Nobel’s motivation for founding the prizes.

So, it could be true, which is honestly good enough for me. 🙂

@baldur @rick Post hoc ergo propter hoc? 😁
@Reea I blew stuff up three days in a row and got a chicken dinner, and it’s my fave, so imma go blow more stuff up. lol
@baldur you hold an idealistic view of the Nobel prize
@matzipan There’s more than one prize.
@baldur your view of them is idealistic. The reality of it is not so great.

@baldur

On the day of his funeral, there ought to be a competing outdoor music festival and celebration.

@baldur Isn’t the actual message that you should periodically tell awful people just how they will be remembered? Not every day; they would start to ignore it.

But once every 5 years or so, the leading story in all the news should be how awful Mr Xyz is.