After blocking hundreds of promotions, Tuberville said the US has 'the weakest military than we've probably had in my lifetime'

Tuberville failed to mention that he's personally prevented hundreds of officers from being promoted because he disagrees with a 2022 Pentagon policy.

https://www.businessinsider.com/tuberville-said-us-has-the-weakest-military-in-his-lifetime-2023-11

Tuberville said US has the 'weakest military' in his lifetime

Tuberville failed to mention that he's personally prevented hundreds of officers from being promoted because he disagrees with a 2022 Pentagon policy.

Insider

This is why no Republicans should ever be allowed into office.

Ever.

I love 1 party states when I agree with the party
Well if the gop folds then I’m sure you’d get a new 2nd party.
Why would competition continue to exist if the precedent of being able to abolish the competing party ever holding office were already set?

precedent of being able to abolish the competing party

Nobody said that, quit arguing with things in your head honey

Read the first comment in the thread. On learn to reading comprehension.

Or I suppose you can continue spouting random shit and appending honey at the end.

honey you are seriously reaching if you choose to interpret “should not be allowed into office” as “we must abolish them”

should not vs shall not, ironic telling someone else to practice reading comprehension

A political party which should not be allowed into office, is what? Turning a major political party into your high school group is not abolishing. Trolling has to have a limit man.

A political party which should not be allowed into office, is what?

the loser, the statement was encouraging a voting position

“everyone I disagree with is trolling”

Hmm, it seems one of us has misinterpreted the statement. I interpreted the should not be allowed in office as, “a law should be passes saying that”.

While you, perhaps correctly assumed that it means people should not vote for them. Sorry I thought you were being willfully obtuse. Still, I am not completely convinced my interpretation of statement was wrong.

But regardless, we are both apparently in agreement on this point.

But, my second point stands, that you are an unpleasant person using intimate and friendly words as an attack.