Thirty years of Internet have shown me that:
1. Self hosting is always worth the trouble.
2. Open source is always a better option in the long run.
Thirty years of Internet have shown me that:
1. Self hosting is always worth the trouble.
2. Open source is always a better option in the long run.
@simon_brooke I agree (though I think self-hosting on cloud is better than nothing).
I've used https://hoppy.network/ in the past to host services at home, you get a public IP for $8/month. There are cheaper solutions. But running servers is challenging — users need to manage upgrades, backups, security issues.
We need to build tools that make this easy for non-technical people.
@simon_brooke I'm working on a blogging platform/social media that tries to help with that:
1. Users run a binary in a computer connected to the internet (I'm planning to use https://redbean.dev/).
2. Friends find each other and exchange data via WebRTC (requires exchanging usernames via some other channel first).
3. Users discover people via their friends, growing their network by adding friends-of-friends.
4. User data is automatically backed up in their friend's instances.
@beto I do not understand why the IT industry doesn't work like the plumbing, or electrical, or whatever, industry. You have a server sitting in a cupboard, or in your attic, or wherever. When something goes wrong you can call any one of dozens of local businesses to fix it. It plugs into municipal infrastructure.
The IT state of the art is basically Word Perfect, Lotus 1-2-3, and AOL, but with advertising, surveillance, censorship, and your data held hostage on the mainframe (or "cloud").
Even though I just a few hours ago got locked out from my own mail server, because it thought my IP was trying to "break in", and not understanding that I am trying to write a mail client and was testing.
And I have long ago forgotten how this mail server works. But at least the ban was lifted after an hour...