This is a fabulous (and very long) article explaining the Supreme Court's centuries-old struggle to distinguish incendiary speech that must be protected from speech that must be outlawed.

https://texaslawreview.org/the-second-founding-and-the-first-amendment/

The tieback to the outlawing of the speech of those enslaved and the incendiary speech of the abolitionists on the grounds that their speech was dangerous is quite interesting.

I spent the morning struggling to digest it.🤓

The Second Founding and the First Amendment | Texas Law Review

Introduction The nation’s founding compromise with slavery resulted in a Constitution that proclaimed universal liberty in theory while protecting human enslavement in practice.[1] After centuries of struggle and a cataclysmic Civil War, a new constitutional order emerged: A Second Founding of the nation that sought to dismantle the legacies of slavery and turn American law […]

Texas Law Review

Karen Turley @KarenTurley wants my Cliff Notes.

These two paragraphs are not fair to the article, which goes into slave narratives and the suppression of the speech of those enslaved, and the overlap between the First and Fourteenth Amendments, but pulled out what I needed.