@mattblaze I strongly agree that he was criminal, corrupt, and incompetent, but so far as I can tell he did not in fact ever urge the public to inject bleach.
(He _did_ urge his scientific advisors to investigate whether injecting disinfectant might be effective against COVID-19. Which is a stupid idea, and even if it hadn't been a public press briefing wasn't the place to raise it. But it was definitely "someone should investigate whether this works" not "the general public should start doing this", and I think the distinction matters.)
@colin_davey @mattblaze Ivermectin. Which is actually a drug used for people as well as horses -- to treat parasitic worms and the like, for which it works really well.
So far as I can make out, the most likely reason why some scientific studies suggested that ivermectin is helpful against COVID is that they were done in countries that have a lot of parasites, and if you have COVID _and_ worms then treating the worms makes it less likely that the combination will kill you.
There was enough evidence for ivermectin that I think a reasonable person could have believed it to be useful against COVID-19, even though I'm pretty sure it actually isn't unless you've got worms. Needless to say, Trump is not a reasonable person and did not say what he did about ivermectin as a result of having looked at the scientific evidence and come to a rational conclusion.
I don't think anyone died _from taking ivermectin_, but probably quite a lot did because they thought they didn't need to get vaccinated because they could just take ivermectin if they got the Plague. And yes, some of that's on Trump. I think he probably killed more people by not being vigorously pro-vaccine than he did by advocating ivermectin as such.