If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.
If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.
You forgot fedora:
Image having a “War Thunder Russian bias” and still giving the Sherman more credit for beating the Nazis than the T-34.
I’m actually offended, and I’ll gladly throw down on any Wehraboo that thinks the Shermans were trash
Love the Debian conclusion. they just might deserve the superiority complex.
I have to admit, Debian is pretty stable.
Beyond the initial setup, Arch has become quite easy to maintain if you have some Linux erperience, mostly because the community has grown a lot in the past few years. Still wouldn’t recommend it to a complete beginner in most cases.
Now, which fucking tank doesn’t require regular maintenance or come with instructions you’re expected to remember?
Me on LMDE: Sherman / Centurion hybrid it is then.
Censhermion? Uh. Maybe not that name though.
NixOS: just a bunch of steel and vehicle.conf
Go to the factory and sudo vehicle-build the tank you want
POV me over a year ago:
People keep repeating that arch is unreliable and yet, I see all the other distros break all over the place. Fedora, Ubuntu etc, every new release breaks a lot of stuff, so people have to reinstall everything.
Arch just works. It has bugs that pop up sometimes, but usually because of Nvidia drivers.
ARCH LINUX
Im really curious as to why arch is always criticized for lack of reliability. Ive set up mine btw a long while ago, update it once a month if I remember and it just works™
Ive used debian previously and every second update left me with fucked up nvidia drivers and needing to boot to shell.