Brought to you by the ocaml gang

https://lemmy.world/post/8244855

Brought to you by the ocaml gang - Lemmy.World

rudt has implicit typing by default for variables tho…?
Yeah but it doesn’t cross function boundaries so it’s more limited.

In other words, in OCaml, you don’t have to write type annotations into the function parameter list. It will infer even those.

It’s useful for small ad-hoc functions, but personally, I’m glad that Rust is more explicit here.

yeah structs, consts ets should always be explicit
It’s not like it’s more limited, it’s just so that it can yell at you when you return not what you sad you’re going to, IMO
OCaml allows you to specify return types, but doesn’t force you to.