"Is this a job?" - Lemmy.zip

Landlords are taxed. Their rental income is subject to income tax, when they sell the home they have to pay a lot more taxes than if they were selling their primary residence, and they have to pay property tax.

Now, I do think residential real estate rental corporations should be straight up outlawed.

They are taxed, but I think they could be taxed more and better. Specifically, I – and many others, including many an economist – think we ought to be implementing a land value tax.

Why LVT and not just leave it to income taxes? In short, LVT is just a really good tax. Progressive, widely regarded by economists as “the perfect tax”, incentivizes efficient use of land, discourages speculation and rent-seeking, economically efficient, and hard to evade. Plus, critically regarding landlords, land value taxes can’t be passed on to tenants, both in economic theory and in observed practice.

Can Land Value Tax Be Passed On To Tenants? | Game of Rent

Georgists assert that landlords cannot pass Land Value Tax (LVT) on to their tenants. Just about every other tax in the world is passed on. Why should LVT be so special?

That’s not the point I was arguing. The rage comic said landlords should be taxed, which caries the implication that they aren’t currently taxed.