Don't forget to join us for the seminar 'Operationalising archaeological #taxonomies using cultural evolutionary approaches – and why it matters' 🌟 with Felix Riede from #Aarhus in our #Garrod Seminar Series at the department of #Archaeology, #Cambridge .
🗓 Thursday, 4pm UK time
Full Abstract: https://www.arch.cam.ac.uk/events/garrod-research-seminars/operationalising-archaeological-taxonomies-using-cultural
Online registration: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJMvde-vpzMqEt08wPbesoHF-HnSdu5yXAgn#/registration
#CulturalEvolution
🗓 Thursday, 4pm UK time
Full Abstract: https://www.arch.cam.ac.uk/events/garrod-research-seminars/operationalising-archaeological-taxonomies-using-cultural
Online registration: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJMvde-vpzMqEt08wPbesoHF-HnSdu5yXAgn#/registration
#CulturalEvolution
Operationalising archaeological taxonomies using cultural evolutionary approaches – and why it matters | Department of Archaeology
Like it or not, classification is a key component of archaeological research. For most archaeologists working with artefacts, typology is unquestionably the means by which such classification is conducted. Typology, however, is critically flawed epistemologically, although it ironically often works in practice.
