Not the argument I’m making. Just that questionable moral choices in people’s private lives shouldn’t affect employment if the consumer is inherently unaffected by the behavior in their personal lives. I think the more talented you are and the better you are at your job, the more protection you should have.

I don’t actually think Jonathan Majors did anything wrong, even and especially if he got physical with some jealous histrionic drunk slut trying to snoop in his phone. All he did was revoke a pussy pass. He should be considered a feminist icon for that, along with Johnny Depp and Sean Connery. He’s too hot and talented to cancel.

You’re doing a huge smooth brained move by making a false equivalence of “questionable moral choices”

The fact that you can’t see how these two things are so very far apart shows enough of who you really are.