29/ Rubin:

Eric still does not recall the meeting, but doesn’t dispute it happened. Eric also told Weisselberg in a Feb. 2012 email that the deal was “on the one yard line.” Eric confirms he wanted to get it done.

30/ Klasfeld hasn't posted for awhile. I may just stick with Lisa Rubin. She's so thorough. If Klasfeld adds anything, I'll post.

Reminder: Emojis mine.

Rubin:

Now Amer moves on to further emails between that member, Weisselberg and Eric about the member’s due diligence as to Trump’s financial condition. Eric’s response to the member reflects — 👉🏼despite his lack of recollection now 👈🏼— that he reviewed the due diligence summary.

31/ ["Pique."]

Eric’s response shows some pique: They showed him the financials in person because of their sensitivity and that he was “bound by confidentiality.”

Eric asks in the email for the member’s assurance that the due diligence summary will not be distributed and that he would limit communications to assuring members that Trump had the financial wherewithal to make the purchase.

32/ Rubin:

Eric confirms they would want to keep them confidential, “no different than any other private company in the world.” He says he wouldn’t have wanted 1200 people to have access to the financials.

Amer is asking Eric whether
by 2012, he was aware that the Trump Org was using the statements of financial condition to demonstrate the company’s financial wherewithal to a third party,

Eric is steadfast: The member met with Weisselberg; “that’s not what I did at the company.”

33/ Klasfeld is back. Some redundancy here bc I'm sharing multi reports:

Eric Trump is shown an email chain about the purchase of North Carolina golf club.

Allen Weisselberg asked Eric Trump on Feb. 12, 2012:

“Before I respond I want to make sure you and your dad are still going forward with this deal. Your dad did not sound very upbeat about the deal. He spoke about how little we would make and that he did not see himself going to NC etc.”

34/ Klasfeld:

Eric Trump replied to Weisselberg the next day that the deal was still on track to move ahead:

“We have bigger fish to fry but we have it on the one yard line.”

35/ Klasfeld:

Another email exchange from Feb. 15, 2012, bw Eric & Philip Delk, who was performing due diligence for the North Car club.

Eric reminded Delk that his inspection of the company's financials was "bound by confidentiality."

In the email, Eric Trump told Delk the company "without question" had the "financial wherewithal to purchase, renovate and operate this asset."

"I trust you understand and would appreciate you giving me your reassurance that this will not be distributed.”

36/ Back to Rubin:

👉🏼Amer is incredulous. You had no idea you had no financials the member was looking at as part of his due diligence? That’s your testimony? Eric says yes, he knew he was looking at “financials” but he did not understand what specifically he was looking at.👈🏼

“Can we at least agree that by 2012, you were aware the company had personal financials to demonstrate to third parties that the company had the financial wherewithal?”

37/ Rubin:

And Eric’s answer amounts to a no: “I was not aware of the statements of financial condition, I did not work on the statements of financial condition. I have been very clear about that.”

Amer asks whether it’s true that McConney specifically represented to Eric that he needed information about the value of Seven Springs for his dad’s statements of financial condition.
👉🏼Eric says no. But here comes the email proof.👈🏼

38/ 😏 #WompWomp

Rubin:

McConney told Eric expressly in 8/20/13 email, in connection w a call between them reflected in the work papers, that he needed assistance w valuing 7 Springs for his father’s statement of financial condition. And McConney attached an excerpt from his supporting data spreadsheet.

So Eric now admits that by Aug 2013, he had seen portions of work papers underlying the statement of finan condition & he mustv been aware of existence of the statements of final condition.

39/ [LOL. Eric's floundering]

Rubin:

Looking at spreadsheet, Eric testifies he easily cd have given McConney the facts abt which portions of the parcels are to be developed/used but says the value seems to have been determined the prior year, prior to his involvement in the project.

Klasfeld's take next.

40/ 🤭

Klasfeld:

Earlier, Eric flatly denied having "anything to do w" his dad's statements of financial condition.

Amer confronts him with then-Trump Org controller Jeff McConney's Aug. 20, 2013 email to him.

“I’m working on your Dads annual financial statement."

41/ Rubin:

“I think it’s established that this predated me…At least that’s not I’m reading this.” Amer explains he just wants to know whether the detail about the 7 mansions was within his knowledge at that time. Eric says yes.

Amer goes back to the email: McConney tells you that he needed your help in *valuing* Seven Springs. It’s a fact, isn’t it, you knew your father’s statement of financial condition was provided to a bank well before then, in Feb. 2012? “Not to my recollection.”

[DRINK!]

42/ [Loving the old "Oh yeah? Well here's the email, Dimwit McTrumpKlan!"]

Rubin:

Amer then takes out a 2012 email between an employee of First National Bank of Long Island and Weisselberg that the latter forwards to Eric, along with an attached confidentiality agreement.

“The chance of my reading a confidentiality agreement that I didn’t execute is close to zero,” Eric states, 👉🏼even though he admits he received it and it references Donald Trump’s statement of financial condition.👈🏼

43/ [Eric's always been... cracked]

Rubin:

Eric finally cracks a little, raising his voice in saying, “We are a major corporation. Of course we had financial statements!”

👉🏼And finally, Amer gets the admission he wants: that at least by the time of his 2013 communications with McConney, Eric understood that his father had statements of financial condition with which his help was needed.👈🏼 #WompWomp

45/ LOL, you love to see it.

Rubin:

Eric Trump is back on the stand at the New York Attorney General’s civil fraud trial, and👉🏼 his temper is flaring👈🏼, saying where he thinks “we’re getting tripped up” is that he did not register that the questions McConney was asking were for statements of financial condition.

Amer insists on a yes or no question; 👉 Eric concedes it appears he knew he was being asked for assistance with his father’s annual financial statements.👈

46/ Rubin:

Later in Apr. 2013, Weisselberg tells Eric in an email that Amer shows him that he wants to delay paying off a loan in connection with Seven Springs 👉🏼to keep the cash balance in his dad’s financial statements were as high as possible.

Eric admits that he understood as of the date of that email that the statements were prepared as of 6/30 of each year and that it had a cash balance component.

47/ Rubin:

Amer persists, “You understood as of the date of this email that your father had an annual financial statement that included liquidity as well as his overall net worth?” 👉🏼Eric: Yes. 👈🏼

Now, they are looking at a July 2013 email exchange between Weisselberg and Eric about the Trump Las Vegas project. In it, Weisselberg told Eric that his dad’s financial statement was needed to secure a line of credit; Eric replied they would not need a line of credit and emphasizes this now.

48/ Rubin:

>>“You read it, right?” Eric acknowledges he did and that by reading it, he would have understood that the Trump Org. was contemplating giving a bank Trump’s statement of financial condition.

Amer moves on to a 2013 email between McConney and Eric in which McConney asks for input on the footnotes of statement of financial condition. Eric says yes, maintaining that it would have been information about two golf properties he was working on.

49/ Eric's being Tish'd.

Rubin:

Amer is asking whether he understood, based on the email, that McConney sent him a portion of his dad’s statements of financial condition.

Eric won’t give that and just says he understood his input was being solicited before finally admitting he understood McConney attached a portion of his dad’s draft financial statement.

50/ Rubin:

>>Now Amer is showing Eric video excerpts from his deposition, where he says he does not recall ever seeing or working on statements of financial condition before this case arose. (Amer is not shown, but it appears he took the deposition as well.)

“To the best of my knowledge, it’s not something I saw… it’s just not in the purview of what I do.”

51/ Dimwit McTrumpKlan is struggling. Real shame. Being on the losing side hurts. 🎻

Rubin:

Eric also disclaimed providing information for use in the statements of financial condition—and he disclaimed that eight ways from Sunday.

Amer: Will you now concede that you were well aware of your dad’s statements of financial condition by the time of those emails?

“No, I was not very familiar with my father’s statement of financial condition.”

52/ Rubin:

But he does admit — in contrast to his sworn deposition testimony — that he knew as of August 2013 that McConney was soliciting information from him for use in the statements of financial condition.

Amer: Will you now agree that you knew about the backup for the statements of financial condition? Eric tries to provide some caveats around the admission,👉🏼 but says yes.

53/ Rubin:

At his deposition, Eric testified that he never had an understanding when speaking to McConney that he was seeking information for the statements of financial condition.

💡Eric now testifies that it did not register with him then, but it now appears that he did know.💡

Amer objects to the speechifying. Engoron agrees. Amer tells Eric, “Your lawyers will have an opportunity to question you. They might not take it, but they’ll have it.”

54/ Rubin:

Now we’re talking about the conservation easement donation on the Seven Springs property, in which Eric played a key role.

Amer is now trying to establish that that donation was contemplated for some time, showing Eric a 2012 letter through which a law firm retained an appraiser’s services in connection with discussions about an easement.

(The law firm involved was where Trump outside tax lawyer Sherri Dillon was then practicing.)

55/ Couldn't resist this from Dan Alexander:

Donald Trump, their father, has not showed here to watch his sons testify so far.

Eric Trump is back on the stand after lunch, and this is getting ugly. The AG's office is juxtaposing a series of documents with what Eric said during his sworn deposition and what is saying now. There seems to be contradiction after contradiction.

56/ Rubin:

Amer is now trying to get into an email between Dillon’s colleague, another lawyer representing Trump the elder, and the appraiser. Trump’s side objects on hearsay grounds; Amer is ready with the rule that permits the admission of conversations between and among a party’s agent.

Notwithstanding the appraiser’s view of the value per lot at Seven Springs, the spreadsheet prepared months later does not appear reflect any of the information obtained from the appraiser.

57/ Rubin:

Do you recognize any of these figures as coming from the appraiser, Amer asks? I don’t recognize any of these figures, so no, Eric says.

58/ Rubin:

We are now, at long last, talking about Trump’s securing appraisal services from David McArdle of Cushman & Wakefield. Eric insists Sherri Dillon was closer to this process,
👉🏼another indicator of their “blame the (now-fired/resigned) experts” strategy.👈🏼

59/ 🦈::Cue: Jaws Theme::🦈

Rubin:

But Amer is building up to a critical point about Eric’s intent:

Eric worked with a professional appraiser to value the donation of the conservation easement at Seven Springs and even signed the engagement letter.

But that appraiser was terminated months later, as reflected in an email shown to Eric, and then reengaged the next year, according to Amer.

60/ Rubin:

Eric affirms that in 2015, he directed Sherri Dillon to get that appraisal finalized so they could complete the donation by the end of the year.

>>I suspect Amer will ultimately force an admission that the resulting appraisal was discarded and/or discounted by the Trump Org., and concealed from Mazars and others in order to inflate Trump’s net worth.

61/ Lol at Ross/Rachel reference.

Rubin:

But now, we are on a break, as Ross and Rachel might have said. So stay tuned.

62/ Klasfeld:

We're back.

Eric Trump is being questioned about the appraisal of the 71 units at the Trump National Golf Club, in Westchester, New York.

63/ Rubin:

We’re in last stretch of Trump trial testimony for today w Eric still on stand about appraisal of another property: Trump Briarcliff, where the org was planning to build 70-something residential units.

As with most of what we’ve seen today, this occurred before the statute of limitations started to run—but to the extent the related valuations are incorporated in statements of financial condition for years to come, they are relevant to the AG’s remaining claims as well as relief.

64/ Rubin:

Amer just shows Eric an email where the appraiser says, per a conversation with Eric, that he intends to perform a discounted cash flow analysis to reflect the expected income from the as-yet unbuilt units. Eric says he didn’t understand what method would be used.

(Spoiler: The ultimate valuation did not, in fact, discount that projected income but valued the units as if the income could be realized immediately and without any deduction for costs of building, marketing, etc.)

65/ Rubin:

Appraiser tells Eric over email he’ll be doing a discounted cash flow analysis & looks fwd to receiving comparable sales figures, which Eric then receives from Trump International Realty staff and forwards to the appraiser. Eric disputes none of this.

By September 2013, the appraiser writes to Eric and says he’s ready to share his valuation conclusions. 👉🏼Eric doesn’t recall whether any call happened nor does he have any recollection “of this whole subject,” he testifies.👈🏼 [Drink!]

66/ Rubin:

The appraiser later says he’s holding off on sending a written appraisal per his conversation with Sherri Dillon. Hmmmm.

At the time, the appraiser told Dillon the “more supportable value” was $45 million and that Dillon indicated Eric learned that and was pleased. 👉 Eric again has zero recollection of this. [Drink!.. Hic!]

67/ Poor Schmucky McNoBrain keeps getting busted.

Rubin:

He doesn’t remember whether it was his decision to hold off on the written appraisal. But Amer shows him the supporting worksheet for the statement of financial condition reflecting that the value of the sell-out was based on comps, as learned from a conversation with Eric.

68/ We're now at the pathetic liar Schmucky McNoBrain saying "I'm the sponge and you're the glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you" part of our program. Or as I like to call it, Nuh-UH! YOU!!

Rubin:

Eric accuses Amer of conflating two very different topics: the conservation easement and the value of the unbuilt units.