Wow. Kyle Cheney đŸ§” 1/


This #Trump post about Mark #Meadows is like a checklist of things barred by the (now-suspended) #GagOrder:
1) Direct attack on #JackSmith
2) Calling cooperators “weaklings” and “cowards”
3) Commenting on the substance of Meadows (a known witness’) testimony

Worth noting Trump almost surely has seen Mark Meadows’ grand jury transcript at this point. It’s part of discovery. #legal #TrumpIndictment

@GottaLaff @lisamelton Isn’t this also a clear violation of Trump’s pre trial release conditions? The government can (and should) move to revoke.
@tommyyum You didn't see my thread? @lisamelton @msbellows
@GottaLaff @lisamelton @msbellows I may not have seen it through!
@tommyyum That's why I asked. @lisamelton @msbellows
@GottaLaff @lisamelton @msbellows The issue being discussed was Trump’s clear violations of a gag order issued by Judge Chutkan; my point is that, even though that order has been stayed pending appeal, it looks like Trump’s also violated his pre trial release conditions, which (I imagine) is immediately actionable.
@GottaLaff @lisamelton @msbellows I’m glad Judge Engoran is holding his tiny feet to the fire! 😆

@GottaLaff @tommyyum @lisamelton And (catching up), I'm going to say something we lawyers rarely say:

I don't know.

His conditions of release (which remain in place even if the gag order is stayed) say he "shall not communicate about the facts of the case with any individual known to be a witness, except with counsel or in the presence of counsel."

What I don't know is whether Meadows is formally "known to be a witness" in the court case yet, nor whether the neutral, indirect "meddlesome priest" framing ("it's just a general social media post, not a DM to Meadows") is enough to keep it from being a "communication." So I get to sit back and see what Smith does, just like everyone else in the peanut gallery.