There is some confusion about Meadows "flipping."

https://abcnews.go.com/US/chief-staff-mark-meadows-granted-immunity-tells-special/story?id=104231281

Immunity is something else: This means essentially that he was forced to testify.

It works like this: If the DOJ gives use immunity, nothing he says can be used against him, so it's no longer possible to invoke the 5th Amendment.

(It's late so I'm not sure I explained it well.)

See:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/immunity#:~:text=“Transactional”%20immunity%20means%20that%20once,from%20or%20obtained%20because%20of

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-718-derivative-use-immunity

Ex-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows granted immunity, tells special counsel he warned Trump about 2020 claims: Sources

ABC News
@Teri_Kanefield , I read the links you provided as well as your explanation. If I understand correctly, the immunity only applies to how his testimony is used, specifically, it can't be used as evidence against him. However, it does not preclude prosecution of Meadows based on other sources of evidence. Did I get that right?

@Dr_Elizabeth97

Correct. You are not the only person to misunderstand it, trust me.

The law often uses common words like "immunity" in specific ways.

I'll post for everyone.

@Teri_Kanefield , thank you very much!