Wow. Kyle Cheney 🧵 1/…

This #Trump post about Mark #Meadows is like a checklist of things barred by the (now-suspended) #GagOrder:
1) Direct attack on #JackSmith
2) Calling cooperators “weaklings” and “cowards”
3) Commenting on the substance of Meadows (a known witness’) testimony

Worth noting Trump almost surely has seen Mark Meadows’ grand jury transcript at this point. It’s part of discovery. #legal #TrumpIndictment

2/ #Chutkan didn’t explicitly add attacks on DC venire to gag order because she said they were covered by previous court orders and Trump’s pretrial restriction.

DOJ is due to argue today why the gag order should be reimposed while Trump appeals it. This is sure to be exhibit A.

And I suspect they (and perhaps Chutkan) would consider this a violation of his pretrial conditions prohibiting witness tampering even absent the gag order.

3/ Via Angry Staffer:

Even with the gag order being stayed, this blatant witness tampering shouldn’t be allowed to stand.

Jesus Christ.

@GottaLaff Silly question, I see you state "Via Angry Staffer" multiple times. Is that a website or news source or are you stating that you're in contact with a staffer that's angry? Sorry if this has been answered or is a silly question. :-) Thank you again for all of your hard work and being transparent with this information.

@ozoned Aw, very sorry, that must sound confusing.

Angry Staffer is a big popular Twitter account, also on Threads now, who used to work in the WH and has the inside scoop on TONS of stuff, tons of contacts and info.

Here’s a link to his Twitter account for confirmation purposes: https://twitter.com/Angry_Staffer

Angry Staffer 🌻 (@Angry_Staffer) / X

Not a current WH Staffer | Politics, NatSec, and Snark — Mileage may vary | Views mine | https://t.co/Kj4zTIdnnS

X (formerly Twitter)