@Hamishcampbell @michaelgraaf @nedhamson
OK, without wanting to get into the long long history of visionon.tv and the #OMN, and focussing on the 'campaign' instance, been looking at the Live feed https://campaign.openworlds.info/public/local
There's very few of us active 'users', who knows how many others are lurking?
In terms of those donating towards the funding of the OMN (which in turn funds and administrates/moderates the 'campaign' instance) there are 10 Financial contributors
https://opencollective.com/open-media-network
Next?
@rooftopaxx @michaelgraaf @nedhamson
it needs to have £40 a month donation, plus some extra to build up a buffer - currently we are down to nothing, not a good way to run the #openweb
@rooftopaxx @michaelgraaf @nedhamson @EarthWolf
if the is a strong enough community to make this happen, it can and should stay online.
@Hamishcampbell @michaelgraaf @nedhamson @EarthWolf
A couple of further thoughts:
If the 'campaign' instance somehow survives, its name is now absolutely meaningless, again a look at "Live feeds' confirms this https://campaign.openworlds.info/public/local
Furthermore this entire 'fluffy/spiky bridge' thing is also rendered meaningless since the demise of the parallel 'activism' instance unless we're missing a trick here?
@rooftopaxx @michaelgraaf @nedhamson @EarthWolf
Yep this is a shame as the fluffy spiky debate is key to real rather social change and challenge, it's basic stuff.
If we can all build a community to sustain the instances then we can reboot activism as a different codebase than mastodon, the are a lot so the ida is still good, can we build a community of use rather than individuals "shouting into the void" as we unkindly like to say at the #OMN