It occurs to me that when someone says that #capitalism is just "human nature", they are actually saying that indigenous people all over the world are or were less than human.

Something that is an inevitable result of human nature should have arisen independently in many times and places, if all these peoples were human.

But what we see is that it arose from a relatively very small subset of people in a certain region at a particular time.

It had to be exported to the rest of the world and implemented *against great resistance*.

If capitalism is human nature this should not have been necessary. It would have been eagerly embraced. So obviously these other people must be more like domesticated animals that must be managed for their own good.

@RD4Anarchy I think I've posted this before, but I always had a sense that something wasn't quite right around here (USA, the west, etc.) When I was younger, I thought most of the world's problems could be attributed to spiraling misunderstandings.
In the last couple of years, though, it's become clear to me that it's the concept of whiteness, western culture, and capitalism that cause all the problems.
The one thing that made it most clear to me was the Southern Strategy here in the US.
@RD4Anarchy for anyone that reads my comment above and thinks I'm nuts, you really owe it to yourself to look into it. The basic (probably oversimplified) idea is that the party/society does its best to make things harder for everyone, because the disadvantaged classes will suffer more. It's the opposite of the idea that a high tide raises all ships. A stormy sea will sink some "good" ships, but many more "bad" ones.
@RD4Anarchy I know this is hours ago by now, but I wanted to clarify something. The point was that the concept of whiteness is bad for everyone, even white people. This, however, is not me saying there's no white privilege. This murky concept manages to provide benefits for some AND dangers for all.