It occurs to me that when someone says that #capitalism is just "human nature", they are actually saying that indigenous people all over the world are or were less than human.

Something that is an inevitable result of human nature should have arisen independently in many times and places, if all these peoples were human.

But what we see is that it arose from a relatively very small subset of people in a certain region at a particular time.

It had to be exported to the rest of the world and implemented *against great resistance*.

If capitalism is human nature this should not have been necessary. It would have been eagerly embraced. So obviously these other people must be more like domesticated animals that must be managed for their own good.

@RD4Anarchy

Yes. Precisely.

It goes hand in hand with the presumption that indigenous peoples were done some kind of "favor" when they were subjugated into this system.

@violetmadder @RD4Anarchy

My favorite are the ancaps who will go to extraordinary length explaining the precise and exclusive mechanism by which property can be legitimately enclosed, and when you mention the dispossession of Native Americans (and the resulting illegitimacy of all property in the US, by their own rules), will respond with some variation of the Randian “those savages? they’re weren’t using the land productively enough!”

@HeavenlyPossum @RD4Anarchy

And then I have to restrain the visceral urge to tackle and throttle them.

I am not a violent person. I am not a violent person. Deeeeeep breaths. Oof.

@HeavenlyPossum @RD4Anarchy

I mean, just... please, please fucking learn to use your HEART and CONSCIENCE productively before you get everyone killed, you awful hubristic fools!