I think it's much less likely than inversely proportional, i.e. nonlinear power function.
The probability of the secret remaining secret is the product of the probabilities of all the people involved keeping it secret.
So if each person has a 95% probability of keeping the secret, the probability that no one out of N people divulges the secret is .95^N.
95%^14 < 49%
95%^50 < 8%
95%^100 < 1%
That's basically my response to anyone who thinks the Dems "rigged" the election. Do they really think the Dems are that organized, competent, disciplined and efficient to pull off a nationwide "rig"? Who was the mastermind? Why hasn't even one of the accomplices spilled the beans by writing a book about how he helped pull it off? But if the Dems did plan and pull off such a masterful "steal" and keep it all secret, don't they DESERVE to be in charge?
You can’t even get these conspiracy theorist nutcases to believe in reasonably objective explanations, with circumstantial evidence, as I did to explain the Las Vegas shootings were an act of revenge of a demented addicted gambler who also happened to be a gun nut.
Instead, these fruitcakes want to believe in second shooters, helicopters, government conspiracies to shut down the second amendment, and every other stupid idiotic thing you can think of.
Goddamn it.
Project management is hard.
Jira, PERT, seeing feature deadlines six months out before you decide on a language... All the shitty process your boss makes you do because he doesn't trust you. That's what makes it _suck_.
I got a whole lot delivered with a notepad file and task estimates of 1,2,4,8.
And that is a fact…
Conspiracy theorists cling to the comforting illusion that someone is in charge. :D