So in addition to cluttering up low earth orbit, wrecking terrestrial astronomy, creating the potential for a Kessler Syndrome cascade which could close access to space, and creating a national security nightmare, Starlink internet access is a climate catastrophe using up to 30 times more carbon footprint per internet subscriber than land based internet.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2394949-starlink-carbon-footprint-up-to-30-times-size-of-land-based-internet/

Starlink carbon footprint up to 30 times size of land-based internet

The satellite internet services provided by SpaceX Starlink, Eutelsat OneWeb or Amazon Kuiper will come with a carbon footprint much higher than that associated with land-based alternatives

New Scientist
@mastodonmigration paywall, so I can't see the article. I wonder how that's calculated? It takes a lot of resources to dig up streets to lay fibre. Is it just on the 30w that it costs to run the Starlink terminals compared to significantly less for a fibre modern?
@guigsy @mastodonmigration I have this question too. Fibre modem itself taps into a provider's network and powered infrastructure before a user hits "the internet".