Miriam BooshPalestinians have been occupied, murdered and denied their rights for decades. To call the events of today “unprovoked” is outrageous.
PapaClaus 
@Miriamm The palestinians launched 1947 together with arab states a war against Israel, lost it and rejected the UN's two-state solution. The maps you show are a result of those palestinian and arab aggresions and are therefore missleading and manipulative.
David BarkinI used to support Israel. But you are mistaken. These Maps show Israeli violations of International Law,
@Ulzana @Miriamm The West Bank settlements (seen in the last map) are a violation of international law, but in no way justify Hamas' violence.
However, the conflict was launched in 1947 by the Palestinians and their Arab allies through a war of aggression, contrary to international law, with the aim of extinguishing all Jewish life in the region. This war and its goals continue due to the constant Palestinian aggressions to this day and are anti-Semitic and deeply despicable.
Daniel Hakimi@RoterClaus @Ulzana @Miriamm To be expecially clear: the occupation is not a violation of any law. Population transfer to occupied territory is, but since some of the territory in question is under dispute, and "settlements" mean very many different things, the situation is rather complicated.
@DanHakimi @RoterClaus @Miriamm
The History is rather complicated, the situation is simplicity itself.
A racist Fascist State is oppressing the population of illegally occupied territory, in which the inhabitants have NO RIGHTS at all. Their land can be arbitrarily seized, and the so called settlers can act with impunity against Palestinians.
@Ulzana @RoterClaus @Miriamm there's nothing racist about Israel, it's the worl'ds most successful example of a socialist democracy, the occupation is perfectly legal considering it comes in the context of a mutual armed conflict, the inhabitants have the same rights as any occupied people anywhere, and calling the situation "simplicity" is a strange lie.
RanDomino@RanDomino @Ulzana @RoterClaus @Miriamm every nation has an immigration policy. Israel, being a relatively young nation of people who were expelled and banned from their homeland on and off for millennia, and being established as the safe place of last resort for people who have been oppressed in every other place they called home, welcomes the Jews, the indigenous people for whom it was founded. This does not resemble a lack of rights for other immigrants.
@DanHakimi @Ulzana @RoterClaus @Miriamm So you agree that Israel has an explicitly racist immigration policy, got it. I'm not interested in your excuses for it. Also, Palestinians are indigenous to Palestine, including the territories occupied in 1948 and 1967. The oppression of Jewish people in Russia and Germany does not give Zionists the right to steal land from Palestinians.
@RanDomino @Ulzana @RoterClaus @Miriamm "the Palestinian people" were not a people in 1948. The term was used to describe whoever happened to live in Palestine, a British colony. They were Turkish colonists, Syrian colonists, Jordanians, etc. Arabs. The Arab people are indigenous to Arabia, and their conquest of their surroundings can be likened to European conquest. Zionists rebelled against the British, and colonists who enjoyed the British colony didn't like it.
@DanHakimi @Ulzana @RoterClaus @Miriamm Palestinians are genetically mostly Canaanite. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/dna-from-biblical-canaanites-lives-modern-arabs-jews
Jewish people have historical continuity only in Tiberias and Jerusalem, and frequent presence in just a handful of other locations in the past 1500 years. Zionists openly admitted they were colonists to Palestine, as shown by the name of this group: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Jewish_Colonization_Association
Also, thanks again for agreeing that Israel has an explicitly racist immigration policy.
@RanDomino @Ulzana @RoterClaus @Miriamm their intent was to buy land. They called that "colonization" because they didn't have a name for them. And regardless of what this particular group called their behavior, the nation there now is entirely independent of any... Uh, colonial organization? Which specifically disbanded? Is that really what you're arguing?
Having an immigration policy is not racist. Fuck off, troll.