Nothing to see here, just join lemmy promoting a pedophile instance. Not a good look for the fediverse

https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400367

Nothing to see here, just join lemmy promoting a pedophile instance. Not a good look for the fediverse - sh.itjust.works

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327 [https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327] > In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2. > > > [https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/93d08422-cab7-4b38-a23d-884c7925f346.webp] > > The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia. > > It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance [https://gui.fediseer.com/instances/detail/rqd2.net] > > Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that. > > You can check yourself here [https://join-lemmy.org/instances]

rqd2.net rule 3:

Nothing illegal under US (specifically Nevada) or local law. You know what that includes. (In case you don’t know what that includes, I mean child pornography [anything that fails the Dost Test], sexually interacting with minors, etc.) We have a zero tolerance policy for anything that fails the Dost test. Anything violating it will result in an immediate ban and removal of images. No admitting to anything that could cause the server to go under investigation, such as looking at child porn.

Just because they aren't directly hosting illegal content, doesn't make it danger free. They freely encourage 'pro contact' as if it isn't a very strong possibility that, when someone is in contact with a person they're attracted to, they may well ... take the next step.
Well yeah, that’s what pro contact means. Pro sexual contact. They don’t think there’s any inherent problem with sexual/romantic relationships between adults and kids.

To them it seems that pro contact means contact with the person you're attracted to, even if it's not sexual yet. Kinda like how you might talk with someone you're crushing on but not dating.

There already is a word for this though. It's called 'grooming'.

I think you may be using a different definition of terms. Pro-contact MAPs think that having sex with minors is fine, and that it isn’t abuse.

If you go to the instance being discussed, you’ll see people openly saying that sex with kids is okay and that they don’t think there’s a problem with it.

Oh...oh...excuse me, I'm feeling sick 🤢