The Atlanta city council and mayor just doxxed and targeted over 100,000 people who signed a petition to put the stop cop city referendum on the ballot.

100k people who were literally just like "the citizens of Atlanta should have a say in this" now exposed via the state to harassment & violence.
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/atlanta/names-more-than-100k-who-signed-petition-against-atlanta-public-safety-training-center-now-public/HF4VD4NTC5FFLAC3IXAB3F6NUU/?outputType=amp

Names of more than 100K who signed petition against Atlanta public safety training center now public

There are more than 25,000 pages of signatures that list names and addresses.

WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta

If your takeaway from this is to argue a point that "technically, home addresses are public data so this is perfectly legal," then let me say it plain:

Home addresses. Should not. Be considered. Public.

Not ever, not once, never before, but especially not in a time of increasingly normalized political violence should a private citizen's home address where they and their families sleep and eat be considered or treated as "public data."

People petition "against" cops (not really what the petition was, but that's how the ATL City Govt is painting it), and then the city makes a huge show of releasing petitioners' names, numbers, and addresses out into the world.

If you're a person with knowledge and experience of this world as it currently is and has for some time been, and you don't see that for the threat it is, i really don't know what to say to you.

@Wolven I've seen governments singling out individuals or small groups for intimidation often enough, but trying to intimidate over a hundred thousand people at once is beyond what I've seen before. I'm hoping it's overconfidence. But in any case, it's a deliberate statement that the city government is directly opposed to democracy.