ik that furry.engineer isn't the place for pedophilia drama but i cant hold myself

mint's case is weird. its like discussing a case where there's no proof of grooming and that no one knows who the manipulator is because both documents, the ones against evie and mint, are lacking context

just, if you're going to expose someone, give too much prior context in screenshots with minimal cropping as possible. both documents suffer from the issue of having a lot of cropping, specifically on the nsfw sections

also about the cub porn... eh. although some people find it disgusting, its just... why make an exposed trying to prove someone likes cub porn. because it seems like both docs try to use that as a reason to judge the accused. if they like it, then they won't change, and it doesn't even make senee in a red flag perspect, because it doesn't hurt anybody by being into something.