Brain-eating cannibal back in public life after 10 years

https://feddit.ch/post/1377005

Brain-eating cannibal back in public life after 10 years - feddit.ch

A man who killed and ate a man has been released back into public life after ten years. Tyree Smith, from Bridgeport, Connecticut, killed a homeless man and then ate his brain and eyeballs according to officials. The horrific case made headline news, with Smith found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity after a July 2013 trial. In lieu of a stint behind bars, Smith was ordered committed to a state psychiatric hospital for 60 years. But now, ten years after the grim incident, the state Psychiatric Security Review Board said Smith was ready to be transitioned back into the community. Smith has been released from the facility, Connecticut’s most secure, as of writing. He will be living in a Waterbury group home, and is not allowed to associate with anyone involved in criminal activity. The board stated in its report: “Tyree Smith is an individual with a psychiatric illness requiring care, custody and treatment. “Since his last hearing Tyree Smith has continued to demonstrate clinical stability. “Mr. Smith is medication compliant, actively engaged in all recommended forms of treatment, and has been symptom-free for many years.” During the trial, Smith’s cousin Nicole Rabb claimed he arrived at her Connecticut home in December 2011, talking about Greek gods and ruminating about needing to go out and get blood. When she saw him the next evening she noticed what appeared to be specks of blood on his pants and that he was carrying chopsticks and a bloody ax. Smith then allegedly told Rabb he killed a man and ate his brains in the Lakeview Cemetery while drinking sake, and grimly warned he intended to eat more people. A month later, police found Angel Gonzalez’s mutilated body in the vacant apartment on Brooks Street in Bridgeport where Smith had lived as a child. Police later recovered the bloody ax and an empty bottle of sake in a stream bed near the Boston Avenue cemetery. The defense’s case rested on the testimony of Yale University psychiatrist Dr. Reena Kapoor, who testified that Smith had kept his lust for human flesh after his arrest, even offering to eat her. Kapoor claimed Smith suffered from psychotic incidents since childhood and heard voices that told him to kill people. She then said the voices ordered Smith to eat the victim’s brain so they would get a better understanding of human behavior and the eyes so that they could see into the “spirit realm.” Kapoor added that Smith went to Subway after eating the man’s body parts. The report on Smith’s release said: “He denied experiencing cravings but stated that if they were to arise, he would reach out to his hospital and community supports and providers.”

How long before he recommits this crime. 10 years that bullshit.
He isn’t walking free, he is housed in a psychiatric hospital for at least 60 years. He will probably never be allowed to leave the hospital
No risk of him repeating the crime unless that guy had two brains and four eyes.
Or maybe they grew back and he got better
Given the shitshow that is American healthcare, sooner. Society will fail him, he will commit another crime, everyone will be aghast at his release, and people will feel vindicated for doubting him. I’ve watched this movie before, it ends with US healthcare becoming even worse.
He ate someone’s brain and eyeballs. He will never be ready to be a part of society. Ever.
Yes, let’s listen to you, someone who most likely has no professional experience in the field of psychology, instead of a bunch of people who did study for it.
He can live next to you

For real, down vote all you want. The fucking guy ate someone. CHEWED. SWALLOWED. ATE. CONSUMED. (eventually) SHAT OUT, A HUMAN.

If you think I’m wrong you can move next door to that fucker and give it a test. Better yet, share an apartment with him

THANK YOU.

Think he’s cured let your kids go trick or treat at his place. Maybe they won’t look like brain veal to him 🤣

I hate to break up the circle jerk, but the dude is going to a group home. It’s not a he can live alone situation, just going from a prison facility to a regular mental health one. At most, he will probably get some supervised outings. Seems fair to me if he is stable and consistent with his meds.
You guys are acting like he's free to teach preschool or something. The dude's going to be spending his life under supervision from people who know more about him and his problems than you do.
Sure. I already trust professionals with my life, why won’t I here?
I live near waterbury, if I see this freak I’m walking the opposite way
Everyone can change
Not in my experience it ain’t . Once an asshole always an asshole. That shits in your DNA. The most they do is go sociopathic and pretend they changed but they always crack.

Of you have depression and tried to commit suicide, will you always end up depressed and try to end your life?

Or is there more to it all?

Mental illness is not that straightforward.

Dude ate a guy. Would you live next door to him?

Unequivocally, yes I would. I work with people who have severe psychiatric disorders pretty regularly. The difference between someone who is untreated vs. someone who is stable and adherent to their med regimen can be light years.

Part of the reason we fear people with psychiatric disorders so much is because we, as a society, fail these people. We have no reliable system for remanding them to get help, if we see signs they are decompensating. The only system we provide is one that only starts to function when they’ve reached crisis level.

That’s not their fault; it’s ours. They deserve better. A better system could have prevented this crime.

“We as a society fail these people”

How do we fail people that would die off without continuous support?

There is a difference between pointing out that certain policies have better outcomes and ascribing moral fault to a society for the actions of an insane fringe.

You are expressing a very modern and ahistorical paradigm of what makes a human being valuable. Deep history shows us fossilized remains of people with injuries like broken femurs that would have been absolutely fatal without continuous support. Disabled people are valuable simply because they are human every bit as much as able-bodied people are, and historically we have dedicated resources to caring for the disabled among us.

It is a very modern idea that labor is the only value a human being possesses, and that those who cannot care for themselves are worthless. What use is anything that we do, if we can’t even be bothered to care for people who cannot care for themselves? What kind of monsters does that pretend we are? And make no mistake, we all start and most of us will end our lives not being able to care for ourselves.

Probably, I view caring for the helpless as a fundamental function of humanity. And yes, we as a society fail at that function, primarily because we fail to recognize it in the first place.

People who voluntarily cause societal harm are not the same as people who suffer temporary (and relatively minor) injuries.

And no those people were not pandered to and taken care of, they were evicted from society or even killed.

“Personally I view caring for the helpless as a fundamental function of humanity”- And you would be wrong. The only fundamental function of humanity is to continue existence.

You are inserting a moral imperative to “save the helpless”. Where the “helpless” are a handful of people who attack and in this case, eat others, and of course their existence is societies fault.

Like I already said there is a difference between making a prescriptive claim that we should do something out of practicality, and a moral claim that society is responsible for the actions of the fringe.

“It’s a very modern idea”- Imagine accusing someone of ahistoricism, and then immediately make false historical statements. Infanticide and senicide have historically been quite common, it is only in modern society where we have enough labor surplus that we are willing to condemn convenient deaths. Of course this is all irrelevant since at no point was I talking about people with injuries, but rather the case of violent perpetrators actively harming others.

I almost want to ask your opinion on abortion, since you are making a deontological right-to-life argument but are directly copying left-wing arguments and phraseology^1^ and left-wingers are vehemently pro-choice, not that there is any logical rule that they should be.

  • Yes, you all talk the same way, make the same statements; you’re not intellectuals, you are parrots.
  • Yes, you all talk the same way, make the same statements; you’re not intellectuals, you are parrots.

    A lot of critical, open minded analysis going on here.

    Perhaps my statement was too broad to be formally provable, but it is quite obvious they they are using buzzwords and arguments exclusive to a certain political sector, completely ignoring it’s lack of veracity and even applicability.

    This would be like a libertarian arguing that the NAP, applies to the immorality of eating toast because it was enumerated in the Bible. A wrong argument based on false premises.

    If you really cared about critical analysis then maybe you should have pointed out all the false statements made by the OP to them.

    Even DNA isn’t that straightforward. Epigenetics is a whole subfield dedicated to studying how and why genes in your DNA are or are not expressed.
    This is sounding dangerously close to eugenics, bud.
    Tell me you know nothing about mental health without saying it
    You know who else thought certain negative personality traits were genetic?
    Kinda wild to compare this situation to just people you don’t like at work.
    I’m all for rehabilitation over incarceration, full stop. But holy fuck this is a wild ass story.

    Yeah this is one where I don’t think you should ever get out. Ain’t worth it.

    If it’s dependent on him being compliant with meds and doesn’t have someone constantly ensuring he’s on them, it isn’t gonna end well. What happens when he just decides he’s fine and doesn’t need them anymore?

    Then the group home that administers his medication reports it?
    Are all group homes equally stringent? I’m not trying to be mean here, but to be honest, this guy being free freaks me out.
    No. There are different levels of care, different staffing ratios, etc. He’d obviously been in a higher level of care

    sentenced to 60 years

    out in 10

    Yes, this is the most important and most frightening in the story.
    It’s like doctors might know more about clinical psychology than a judge…
    It’s almost as if these doctors don’t have the foresight to see that in a couple of months he’ll end another life
    He was sentenced to sixty years in a psychiatric facility, but was cured in ten? Great. Put him in prison for the remaining fifty.
    Why? For punishment?

    Good question. I made my comment hastily, without taking time to think.

    I’d have to know more about the judges rationale. Was the plan to keep him out of society for sixty years, or was the original intent actually to help and rehabilitate him?

    I let my revulsion carry me away. If he’s cured, then letting him rot in jail wouldn’t help anyone.

    He's not cured, he's being treated. And he's not just being released to the generap public, he's still going to be living in a group home, with managed care and accountability.
    Those are good things to remember as well. It’s not just “good luck, bye!” The group home and continuing treatment are important. Thank you!
    Props to you for admitting that. We all say things in the moment, but most of us aren’t mature enough to admit when we might have been wrong
    Thank you. That means a lot.

    I mean that’s the whole point of the insanity plea. He didn’t do it for greed or for evil. He had a severe chemical imbalance that they’ve been able to treat and now he is once more socially viable.

    60 years of prison would be to punish somebody for doing something that they knew was wrong, or depending on your world views to make sure that he stays incarcerated for public safety.

    They didn’t give him 60 years in the funny farm to make him think about what he did. That’s the maximum amount of time he was supposed to spend in there if he didn’t get it sorted out.

    That said, he would be kind of nice if we had a public health system that could check up on this guy once every 30 60 days or so, Make sure he doesn’t fall off the wagon on his medication.

    Presumably he will be on parole or probation or something, so he will be checking in.
    50 years of parole by my math.
    We probably need people with that serious of medication problem to be checked up on for the rest of their lives. He falls through the cracks really bad s*** happens.
    I’m… glad I don’t live in Connecticut. Put this guy on a no-fly list please.

    The board stated in its report: “Tyree Smith is an individual with a psychiatric illness requiring care, custody and treatment.
    “Since his last hearing Tyree Smith has continued to demonstrate clinical stability.

    So~ he's gonna be added to a secret list of people who basically get their (mandated) medication free, right? People's financial situation tend to worsen at times. 😐

    So~ he’s gonna be added to a secret list of people who basically get their (mandated) medication free, right?

    I would hope so.

    Most likely he’s on Medicaid. He’s going to a group home on a monitoring program and missing doses because he couldn’t afford them would be a probation violation. I don’t know the exact details, but I’m willing to bet that’s how they have it structured.

    Some of y’all really need to figure out the difference between punishment and rehabilitation…

    And which one actually works.

    Stop stroking your hate boners and start advocating for real solutions. You don’t fix pain with more pain. All that does is exacerbate the cycle.

    I feel like there’s a lot of steps between rehabilitating a chronic shoplifter and a guy who killed and consumed a guy’s brain. Even if someone is rehabilitated should they escape punishment? Should we not punish people for what they do to others?

    Sometimes the lessons that stay with you longest are learned through pain.

    If the guy was truly determined by actual professionals (aka: not you) to be fit to return to society, then what’s the issue?

    What gain does anyone get from unnecessarily punishing him longer? It’s just a waste of time and resources to inflict pain on an individual because people can’t accept that someone can change.

    Punishment does very little in the way of teaching a lesson. Do some actual research.

    While I trust professionals in many things, I’m not sure how much experience they have dealing with cannibals who harbor murderous intent. Can you honestly say to me that what little money and resources it takes to keep this single man locked up is worth the possibility of him doing it a second time? What’s a second life worth? Ten years?

    I think people like you are a hair from being as insane as the people they lock up. Not all crimes should be forgiven and cold blooded murder is at the top of that list. Sure, he should be allowed to earn more freedoms but released back into society?

    Absolutely fucking not.