I've been talking about how AI will directly lead to Idiocracy (2006) scenarios (like Brawndo has what plants crave, Charlie Chaplin leading the 3rd Reich, etc) for some time, but today's update to the "can you melt eggs?" saga is as clear an illustration of how as I think it's possible to ever have.
Quora's AI answers made up the melting point of eggs, and then Google picked it up and responded affirmatively that you can indeed melt eggs.
Then people wrote articles about how stupid it is that Google says eggs can melt. Then Google fixes the answer.
Then Google ingests an article about how stupid it is that Google says you can melt eggs, and suddenly Google starts answering affirmatively again that you can melt eggs, citing the article about how stupid Google is for thinking you can melt eggs.
@nyquildotorg
#AI
This exists in human-written scholarly papers as well. Citations get copied from one paper to the next without review. "Artificial Intelligence is no match for real stupidity." (everybody, ~2007)
I do think the [Artificial Intelligence] descriptor should be replaced with [Clever Idiocy] so we truly admit the limitations of the tools.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500547/

MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications
Inaccurate citations are erroneous quotations or instances of paraphrasing of previously published material that mislead readers about the claims of the cited source. They are often unaddressed due to underreporting, the inability of peer reviewers and ...
PubMed Central (PMC)@Ralph @nyquildotorg
I prefer the term "Automated Idiocy"
That way we can use the same acronym
@bornach @nyquildotorg
I think "Mechanical Savant" is what I was reaching for. It contains the idea that the box is only educated in one dimension (or domain of knowledge).
I like the idea of AI as an acronym (AI! AI! AI!πΆ ), but I worry about acronym overloading (it will confuse the AIs).