Reading "Doppelganger" by @naomiaklein based on a recommendation from @pluralistic
The analysis of the mirror world of Bannonite conspiracy theories is poignant and important.
Just as scary, however, is the mirror world into which "hard centre" democrats receded after Trump's victory in 2016: The election was "stolen" by Russian interference, Trump was a "Russian asset", Putin was the evil mastermind behind it all. Instead of owning up to Clinton's loss, they all seemed to have gone insane.
Just like the tendency to blame the "white working class" for Trump's victory. In actuality, the white working class was under-represented among the Trump voters.
Why did these centrists supposedly all defending "reason" go down that rabbit hole? Maybe it is and was too painful to recognize that business as usual and dynastic entitlement (and "lean in" feminism) is not what the US needs right now. What it needed at the time was Bernie Sanders.
I make this observation because while reading the book I was kind of waiting for this point to be made ... of some Democrats' tremendous own goal attacking Trump for being the traitor and Russian spy he's not instead of as the right-wing populist he actually is. Like ... I wonder what the connection between that kind of "centrist" insanity/orhodoxy (think TINA, War on Drugs etc.) and COVID-style conspiracies is, at the end of the day.
Relevant for the idea of "lean in" feminism and allowing women and minorities in board rooms, I'm currently based in the UK (normally, Denmark) and the government here is a case in point: Is Rishi Sunak as PM a victory for anti-racism and inclusivity?
No, that's not a victory for anything. Sunak may be non-white, but what matters is that he's *posh*. Inclusivity would, in the UK, mean letting people in who are not upper class. More precisely, who are not *rich:*.
“Member of historically-excluded group is now just as big a shit as members of the traditionally dominant elite" is not the diversity, equity and inclusion victory we were looking for.
@agger @[email protected] @pluralistic
Nah. This is why intersectionality is important. Sunak, and Thatcher (and Palin) being elevated *are* very narrowly victories for their communities they represent on the national stage, but only narrowly.
Claiming they are *not* narrow victories is a form of performative foolish intergroup signaling. A woman in charge is a victory for Woman. Claiming but they're not the right kind of *under represented group* is a big giveaway.
@agger @naomiaklein @pluralistic
How is the white working class underrepresented in itself? Did you mean something else? Do you mean its self-proclaimed leaders?
Carsten Agger
Charlie Stross
Angus McIntyre
ersatzmaus
HighlandLawyer
Aloopapu
Kofi Loves Efia 
mike bayer 
Psittacus cafeina