@DataDrivenMD
I think it is ego in the corporate echo chamber. Success looks like this so this is how to be successful, except itās that way because of this argument and other ways are rejected.
You have a history of toxic āsuccessā where the opportunity cost of doing it better is never accounted for. It is what feminism calls the patriarchy.
āIām in charge, Iām paying so do it my way or quit.ā
Itās the weak āstrong manā.
This blinkered approach still doesnāt recognise itās a value exchange where the studios need to compensate with cash because itās all they have. Confused by the total volume of cash being worth more than the pay of the individual while not equating to the market value of the individual.
Itās the culture of less money is better as growth is shrinking, slamming against the want to be the best.
It is in effect an agency problem except failure is from incompetence not malice. Also, survivor bias as stories of good deals donāt survive the editors.