The article you posted is from Aug 17th, and promises to release a “more complete statement”, not any particular “findings” you might be expecting

That came in the form of another video Aug 26th, where they go into the changes in production processes, including changes to fact checking procedures.

Crucially they acknowledge that it wouldn’t be realistic for them to simply not make any mistakes moving forward, but they detailed some procedures to mitigate the chance of it including collecting community feedback from interested subject matter experts in advance of publication. Sounded pretty reasonable to me, and the case you mentioned where they subsequently got something wrong doesn’t really seem like a significant error, or one they haven’t adequately addressed/corrected.

I’m not sure what else you expected? In a scenario where they have addressed the concerns to your satisfaction, what would they have done differently?

At the final paragraph:

Linus Media Group CEO Terren Tong also responded via email, saying he was “shocked at the allegations and the company described” in Reeve’s posts. He went on to note that “as part of this process, beyond an internal review we will also be hiring an outside investigator to look into the allegations and will commit to publish the findings and implementing any corrective actions that may arise because of this.”

Clearly say commitment to publish.