Additional thoughts:

- The "AI" parts of this announcement would by itself be a reason to stop using Unity
- Having a per-seat license AND a per-install fee is just so insulting. Like, pick one, sister
- Godot has improved SO MUCH lately. I know people shipping commercial games with it now.
- Godot can to some degree import Unity projects. I'm not sure how well it works but there's a Godot plugin that claims it can import scenes/assets. I wonder if we''ll see increased activity around that now.

Last thought:

- The decision to make the fee based on lifetime sales of *a game* sounds very easy to game unless the TOS has some clever language around what constitutes a single game. Will this have visible knock-on effects to game *players*? In other words, doesn't this rule create an incentive to shut down and "relaunch" FTP live-service games repeatedly? People already complain a lot about their phone games shutting down after they accumulated loot and whatnot. Will this make it worse?

@mcc I absolutely guarantee that some solo/microstudio indie devs will get absolutely shafted by this when they suddenly realise they were supposed to been hanging on to 20 cents per sale after their $1 game unexpectedly sold 500,000 copies after becoming a streamer meme one week.

Not using any reference point of game price and studio revenue in all this is wild.