Ars TechnicaOpenAI admits that AI writing detectors don’t work
No detectors "reliably distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated content."
deco@arstechnica @mhoye I don't know man. Every now and then I ask for help writing a section of a tech proposal for a topic that i don't know much about and someone sends me text that - I'm like, ok, literally ALL you did was ask chatgpt and then copy/paste the results into an email to me. It's immediately obvious to me. I just say thank you and then throw it out
Jo - pièce de résistance@deco
same. It's obvious so far to me too that these are bots with only semi cohesive strings and very banal or faux presentation style.
More often than not it makes no sense as a whole, it's like a collage made with poison glue.
mhoye@JoBlakely @deco @arstechnica this is a good opinion. Many experts believe that it has collage in common with other opinions. Some experts also believe that poison glue is a good substitute for faux presentations or banalosity.
@mhoye @deco @arstechnica
is this a test? Was your comment made with chatgpt? bc it sounds like it. lol.
is this a test? Was your comment made with chatgpt? bc it sounds like it. lol.