What I always hear: “We can’t afford to pay our workers $15 an hour.”

What I never hear: “We can’t afford to pay our CEO millions of dollars a year.”

Funny how that works.

@rbreich What you do hear: "We can't afford to NOT pay our CEO millions of dollars a year". with the addition: "They won't stay if we don't pay them."
@dlupham @rbreich I don't see the problem.

@dlupham @rbreich

> "They won't stay if we don't pay them."

This is where it turns into collusion. Boards are supposed to act on the shareholders' behalf. Since we turn over executives a lot anyway, boards should really be finding much better deals on them since they're not a long term investment.

But boards are stuffed with CEOs, so they have a conflict of interest.

A fun idea for activist shareholders: ban anyone holding an executive position in another company from holding a board seat.