BigD@Kay @toa5t I tend to view Nats position on their solution to how we should treat the whole argument.
Water should be in their view be one entity, no discrimination, so it should all be channelled through one pipe.
This would save enormous amounts of bureaucratic interference (thus money), high and low skilled workers ( money), get the job done in a third the time(money) and enormous savings (money) on pipe infrastructure, that can be channelled into what's really needed, ROADS.
Simple eh.
Water should be in their view be one entity, no discrimination, so it should all be channelled through one pipe.
This would save enormous amounts of bureaucratic interference (thus money), high and low skilled workers ( money), get the job done in a third the time(money) and enormous savings (money) on pipe infrastructure, that can be channelled into what's really needed, ROADS.
Simple eh.
Kay 
