Having a conversation on Blue Sky about the frustration people over there have with Mastodon.

A lot of it involves capricious defederation, where server admins, usually of smaller instances, will sever people from their friends by defederating from a server over the presence of a few trolls. And, the instability of building a network in such conditions.

One person mentioned radio silence from an admin after being unable to log in.

Not sure what to do with this information. But these are clearly issues that have pushed people away.
@alexwild Someone did an informal survey and these issues were mentioned, but The Culture was the biggest factor in people leaving. I found that kinda interesting.

@BlueAppaloosa
Me too, because culture is exactly what freaks me out about these other services. I am deeply concerned if people are just okay with fascists spreading lies just because "it is not illegal" and I can happily deal with a bit less convenience. If that puts someone off, then I have the feeling our ideals do not allow and separate networks are the better option anyways? Like what are people actually still doing on Twitter?

@alexwild

@alexwild

Again, reminds me of the early BBS days. Luckily, I've not experienced such during my time on Mastodon.

@alexwild in my experience, since November 2022 larger servers are more unstable since so many servers grew explosively beyond admins' ability to moderate; we've seen several quite large ones go down relatively suddenly. Yours, as one of the flagships, is no doubt around for the long term. However, large servers are almost all poorly moderated (including yours) and are often blocked or muted by servers with more strict rules.

Large servers run by, shall I say, ill-equipped people are also prone to accidental or impulsive defederation—e.g. Kolektiva accidentally defederating from mastodon.social during the latter's spam wave because they didn't understand how the feature worked, or the mstdn.social admin unexpectedly defederating mastodon.art over the latter's anti-Threads policy. However, the consequences are far more disruptive, and less easy to excuse, with large servers. (1/2)

@alexwild For these reasons I still strongly recommend small servers over large ones—but also that prospective members should first ask the admin about their moderation philosophy and how they deal with growth.

I've written more about what people should think about when choosing a server here: https://nevillepark.ca/2023/07/01/how-to-choose-a-mastodon-fediverse-server/

Of course, most people are used to corporate social media and want an impersonal and professionally run service they can sign up for immediately and seamlessly reach anyone in the world; and they don't want to have to think about how it's funded, whether they can trust the people who run it, or what their ethics and personality are. In that case I would say the fediverse is simply not a good fit for what they want. (2/2)

How to Choose a Mastodon/Fediverse Server – Neville Park

@nev @alexwild Another amazing feature of smaller topic-based instances is that the "Local" tab produces a stream of excellent content, consisting of my kind of people. I get this on my scicomm instance, and I would get it on Neville's "flipping rocks" instance too.

@JosephTLapp @alexwild Note: flipping.rocks uses the Hometown fork, which allows for local-only posting as well. (Same privacy rules apply, the posts just don't get sent out to other servers.)

A proposed? upcoming? Mastodon change will combine Local and Federated timelines, which is useful for huge servers but undesirable for small or more topic-focused ones. IIRC the official app doesn't even show you a local timeline?

In general over the years Mastodon development has skewed towards the needs of huge servers and away from smaller and less visible ones, a thorn in many of our sides. However, there are more lightweight platforms being developed like GoToSocial and Takahe which may prove more suitable for small communities.

@alexwild Do they think Blue Sky will be any different? The BS protocol is destined for federation and the same issues. I'm not discounting the issues FWIW, there are real problems. When you are on one server along with the rest of the user base, you can pretend like these problems don't exist for your platform when they absolutely will.
@najakwa my sense is, a lot of people seem to view blue sky as a holding place, rather than a Big Next Thing, and so aren’t terribly interested in defending it or comparing it.
@najakwa they find blue sky easy, and light, if not terribly consequential.
@alexwild I think someone should make a Mastodon shard called (something animal sound like squack) and advertise on Twitter and ask everyone to pass it to their followers. It can be the Twitter away from Twitter. I don't want to do it but someone should.
@alexwild It is indeed advisable to either self-host or carefully choose one of the larger instances (however, some of those are also known to be extremely restrictive) to avoid random and potentially intrusive admin decisions that may affect your use of the Fediverse.