Banksy Encourages Fans to Shoplift From Guess Since Company 'Helped Themselves to My Artwork Without Asking’

https://feddit.uk/post/2038944

Banksy Encourages Fans to Shoplift From Guess Since Company 'Helped Themselves to My Artwork Without Asking’ - Feddit UK

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/1977881 [https://slrpnk.net/post/1977881] > Excerpt: > > >Banksy isn’t happy with Guess’ latest collaboration. > > > >The legendary anonymous graffiti artist had a directive for his followers on Friday, encouraging them—possibly tongue in cheek, possibly not—to visit the Regent Street Guess store in London and steal the brand’s new collection that features his artwork. > > > >“Attention all shoplifters. Please go to Guess on Regents Street. They’ve helped themselves to my artwork without asking, how can it be wrong for you to do the same to their clothes?” >

What a fucking idiot. He / she could have sued them if he felt aggrieved instead of encouraging people to commit crimes.
But where’s the fun in that?
Sure! If you’re a clown 🤡.

He / she

Why do you assume Banksy is one of those? We don't know who Banksy is.

True true. Maybe they are a multinational conglomerate? 😅
Grandma, what are these stencils?!
Robert Del Naja (of Massive Attack) is Banksy. You’re welcome.

I don't think Banksy wants me to know that info, so I'm going to take special care to not remember that info.

Just like I have no idea who dril is.

Last time he had to take it all the way to the appeal court to get them to agree he had the rights to his own images.

I can understand not wanting to do that again.

And he still lost trademarks on at least 4 of his major pieces because he wanted to stay anonymous
Yet stealing someone’s art and selling it for a profit doesn’t seem to bother you.
Did I say that? Or did you just jump to that conclusion?
You’re more upset by shoplifting than by the unethical theft and exploitation of someone else’s artistic work, so yes, you did say that.

You seem to be making things up again. 😥

I don’t like people breaking the law, and I said I don’t think it was a good idea to encourage law breaking. Where in that did you take it to understand that I support theft or exploitation of artwork?

You’re still crying about people shoplifting yet you still haven’t condemned the artwork theft. Reading between the lines and calling out your bullshit isn’t “making things up,” buddy.

When stealing someone’s artwork is completely legal but fighting back against it by stealing from them is against the law, maybe “the law” is just a bunch of worthless bourgeoisie bullshit. Stealing from thieves is objectively cool. Cry more about it.

Are you an actual 14 year old? Jesus who hurt you this badly?

Ok here you go, I have no opposition to condemning artwork theft. It is wrong and should not happen. Happy? Oh shit where’s your reading between the lines now?

At the same time encouraging others to break the law and steal is also wrong and a shit head move to do.

maybe “the law” is just a bunch of worthless bourgeoisie bullshit. Stealing from thieves is objectively cool.

Dios mío 🤣🥸

Are you an actual 14 year old? Jesus who hurt you this badly?

“Everyone who disagrees with me must be a child. There’s no way anyone could possibly disagree with me about anything.” Damn what an original, well-reasoned argument.

Ok here you go, I have no opposition to condemning artwork theft. It is wrong and should not happen.

Finally dragged out of you after two posts of crying hard about something objectively less worse,

At the same time encouraging others to break the law and steal is also wrong and a shit head move to do.

At the same time only one of things you shit your pants about.

Dios mío 🤣🥸

Engage with the argument or fuck off.

No people that post with a “hurrr durrr you don’t like theft fight me” attitude are children.

Finally dragged out of you

Dragged what out of anyone? You’ve misunderstood basic words, jumped to conclusions, and are now irate.

At the same time only one of things you shit your pants about.

Like I don’t… I don’t know what the heck this is supposed to mean? Do I take you seriously or assume you’re a child? My best bet right now is to assume you’re a child by the way you’re responding. How is it controversial to be against theft? I dunno apparently it is 🤷.

No people that post with a “hurrr durrr you don’t like theft fight me” attitude are children.

It took several posts for you to admit art theft is bad. Which one of us doesn’t like theft, again?

You’ve misunderstood basic words, jumped to conclusions, and are now irate.

“u mad bro” wow another great argument, damn you’re knocking it out of the park.

Like I don’t… I don’t know what the heck this is supposed to mean?

But I’m the one struggling to understand basic words lmao.

My best bet right now is to assume you’re a child by the way you’re responding

As opposed to the totally mature way you’re responding, which is *checks notes* telling the other user he doesn’t understand words, calling him mad, and constantly accusing him of being a child. Wow I sure am glad there’s a real adult in the room.

Anyway since at this point you’re just calling everyone who disagrees with you a child and refusing to actually engage with the argument I’m not going to waste my time any further. Have a

It took several posts for you to admit art theft is bad.

Listen to yourself. Several posts to admit. What are some sort of detective? As if you’ve uncovered some hidden secrets? Because I hadn’t used the words theft of art is also theft you assume I am pro art theft? This is your faulty logic, buddy.

Anyway at this point you’re just calling everyone who disagrees with you a child

I’m specifically calling you a child 😉. Because you’re a child.

refusing to actually engage with the argument

You have no argument. You’re straw manning and trying to pick fights. Stop.

Breaking the law is actually cool and good. Ideally, I think people should break the law more often, not less often.

I don’t like people breaking the law

I do

His celebrity status depends on hyperbolic rhetoric like this. If he had handled it the way normal people do, through courts, he’d be damaging his mystique. The sheep that think he’s the bee’s knees slurp this bullshit up.
So? Is he wrong?
I can’t say legally since I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think much of people who suggest you do (crime) because (crime) occurred. I consider it a low-end mentality to view that as a resolution or justice of some kind.
I don’t think that it’s a resolution or justice, I think it’s funny ^^
Not as funny as the fact that a person adept at using stencils to paint on other people’s property getting upset someone used his stenciling on their property, IMHO.
I support people painting on gray walls in cities!
As I support a company’s right to use the likeness of illegal graffiti on their clothing.
So you’re a bootlicker? A fascist? You honestly prioritize corporate profits over public art? Fuck you.
Well that escalated quickly
I support it if it’s what the people want.
Or maybe the ultimate troll artist, is fucking trolling. Perhaps making a joke about stealing their stuff because they stole his.
Perhaps. He’s super-clever like that.

Imagine obliquely calling someone basic when you had to have their point explained

Jesus Christ you are a moron.

Jesus Christ you are a moron.

Ok.

The motherfucker is a stooge of the system man! Probably got more lawyers than John Gotti lol.

Also, in his book Wall and Piece, Banksy said “copyright is for losers” and the public was morally and legally free to reproduce and use any public copyright works.

I mean, according to his own words, I guess?

smh.com.au/…/copyright-is-for-losers-how-did-bank…

‘Copyright is for losers’: How did Banksy’s brash claim backfire?

A quick guide to why Banksy lost the trademark for four of his most famous works.

The Sydney Morning Herald
Corporations don’t deserve that right. His stance on this is directly related to corporate abuse of the system. Nuance is difficult though so I understand why it’s easy for you to feel like you made a good point.
Just ignore them man. It’s cool to hate Banksy even it means simping for Guess.
Let people enjoy things

If he had handled it the way normal people do, through courts

There is more to it than that. He's been blocked from claiming the copyright on his own work since he'd need to dox himself. He can't claim the copyright as 'Banksy' since it's not his real name.

Banksy is a complete fucking poser, true, but also shoplifting is good.
Also visit other stores as well 🫡
Doesn't Banksy's entire schtick hang on "helping himself" to a "canvas?"
Yeah but different rules for him, right?
yes individuals and multinational corporations should have different rules. Large corporations whose decisions can impact entire communities should be held to much more rigorous standards than individuals.
But why not the opposite! /s
There’s a legitimate discussion to be had about whether not he should be doing that, but to compare it to a multinational corporation selling clothes using his work without his permission is pretty disingenuous.
From zero to bad faith in one comment, bravo c/unitedkingdom.