Is there already a label for "human generated content" / "AI free" for all sorts of media (texts, literature, music, images, videos, ...) that is created without transformers, dl, ...?
When should such a quality (?) seal be applicable? How about authors that themselves have consumed generated content and thus are influenced in their thinking? Which would be strict borders of such a label (text correction, suggestion of rewording, ...)?
(1/2)
Or should we proactively declare when we use "AI"?
Would that actually be ethically required, as otherwise we would confuse our content consumers about our mind, creativity etc. just like filter-users for pictures and videos confuse their viewers about their actual image?
(2/2)
@redcat How does this help if whatever you say becomes too impressive? Either others will assume that you have not thought of the process yourself and assume that you have used an AI, or they will be intimidated and long for such wise thoughts. Which will result in them always reading more to reach the same level of wisdom ...
Ok, I see that the allegory with picture / video filters ends there, as this is not necessarily a negative outcome compared to being anorexic.
🤔
@redcat But thinking about other media than text, I believe that there is actually a lot more similarity to this scenario, especially if humans are created.
The other thing of course is sheer mass of BS content. Not that it's not bad enough already.
Anyway, thanks for taking responsibility. I'm still not sold that responsible use of such tools can be reduced to accountability alone.
𝑙𝑢𝑓𝑡
redcat