TheOneWithTheHairMaker of ‘smart’ chastity cage left users’ emails, passwords, and locations exposed
AutoTL;DRThis is the best summary I could come up with:
The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users, thanks to two vulnerabilities.
He also reached out to the company on June 17 alerting them of the issues in an attempt to get them to fix the vulnerabilities and protect their users’ data, according to a screenshot of the email he sent and shared with TechCrunch.
[REDACTED] has left the site wide open, allowing any script kiddie to grab any and all customer information.
“Your cock is mine now,” the hacker told one of the victims, according to a researcher who discovered the hacking campaign at the time.
In 2016, researchers found a bug in a Bluetooth-powered “panty buster,” which allowed anyone to control the sex toy remotely over the internet.
In 2017, a smart sex toy maker agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by two women who alleged the company spied on them by collecting and recording “highly intimate and sensitive data” of its users.
The original article contains 702 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
No, no, no, no. No. Surely the hacker knows the victim probably did not see that comment as a threat 😭
Sign up the cage, get a bonus dom!
Some things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
Some Most things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
FTFY
Some MOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
FTFY
Some MOST ALL things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
IFTTT
Some MOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
CluelessDudeSome MOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
Checks out. All suffering in the world is caused by being.
FaceDeerBut that just makes connecting those things to the internet forbidden... and therefore alluring.
A piece of internet history. So glad it’s been preserved.
…provides the most complete remote sex solution for the Internet and corporate intranet.
Lol ha ha
Track_ShovelApparently I’m one of those things. Jesus, what an article
Unfortunately connecting this kink to the internet facilitates doing it. Having the device itself connect for ease of use had caused an unbelievable amount of tech issues, though. To be fair the programmer is a dipshit, though.
sugarfree
RiskableThe researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,
10,000 users‽
yup :3
Flying SquidRule 34 extends to action as well as observance.
he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does
Don’t mix your pen testing with your pen testing if you know what I mean.
yukichigaiThis exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.
Isn't this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it's more of a service.
That would be non-consensual.
Probably in the EULA
Consensual non-consent
JackFrostNColaI feel like like the potential for being exposed as a chastity cage user might actually be a plus for some users
That thumbnail is A+
This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥So is the headline. Chastity cage, exposed. 🤣
God i hope the users used a email alias and fake names
good, cause they where stupid enough to buy a fucking smart chastity cage
And to think I don’t even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV…
Your cock is mine now
I’m dying
treadfulThat probably worked for most of the clientele.
Liberal men on suicide watch
Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao
PeachManWe live in the weirdest timeline
Better than having it locked on I suppose…
for people with a penis
So, men?
Trans women too
Yeah, but you can also just say men, that’s fine. If we go that route we should add asterisks on every word with explanations and definitions and whatnot.
Or you can just quit bitching when people choose inclusive language. That’s fine.
I’m trying to make the poing that changing language to be inclusive doesn’t work. It’s the same as the LGBT group, that now is LGBTQIRBFHAHFH or something? I lost count. Same with the damn rainbow flag that now looks more like a million pixels project than a flag.
Every day there is somebody out there that feels special and now needs to be included too and it hasn’t stopped and it won’t stop.
Somebody is trans and wanted to be a man and transitioned? How about we just call them what they wanted to be in the first place? “Men”. Simple.
This entire “people with penises” languages is just made up solutions for made up problems that doesn’t actually solve or improve anything
You’ve made so many comments to whine about one person using specific and inclusive language. You waste a lot more time demanding that the general population regress to your level of ignorance than you would just observing and moving on.
In this case, the person was talking about penises and the people who have them. The rules you are trying to apply don’t work here. Trans people without penises would not be included in what the person was talking about.
Nobody cares that you don’t like the aesthetic of the progress flag. Nobody cares that LGBTQIA2 is too big for your brain. You’re not the main character. I think that’s the real issue you’re rallying against here.
Here’s that problem you were asking for. Hope you love it!
I don’t get it?
People who buy chastity cages presumably want someone to lick them in it and refuse to let them out … like the hacker was doing to them.
some_guyAh yeah see you knew what they meant. What’s the issue?
The overly PC language that is just annoying most people just so you a can pretend to include people when in reality you don’t.
Just talk plain English. It doesn’t insult or exclude anybody to say “men” or “women”
What’s not plain English about “people with a penis”?
Is the word “people” too difficult for you?
Or you can stop playing dumb, of course.
Nobody talks like this but a very small and very select little group of people that can’t stop congratulating eachother for being so politically correct.
Who’s playing dumb?
You knew what the speaker meant and challenged their use of language.
I’m asking what’s unclear about the term “people with a penis” and you’re getting riled up.
Are you ok?
I’m unsure what is hard to understand. The problem is people talking like they’re mentally retarded just to avoid stepping on the toes of special snowflakes. There. Clear? I am getting tired of people falling over themselves to avoid a tiny group going “eeeekk!!!” for no reason.
You can just say “men”. That IS the right word, you don’t insult anyone.
The problem is you.
I’m not the one requiring special treatment
Kinda seems like you are, though. Everyone is fine with the way things are being phrased here and you are just triggered as fuck and constantly bitching. You’re making everything worse for everyone because you need things to be your way regardless of how everyone else feels. Like an 8 year old.
You’re the one getting flustered and demanding everyone else use the words that make you comfortable, rather than the words they prefer.
What do you think “special treatment” means exactly?
Special treatment is when people don’t do what he wants, and just being normal is when everyone bends to his will.
The problem is people using clear language to describe something, and you preferring different language? Is that correct?
Give it a few years and we won’t be able to use the word penis, because now that is deemed toxic. The proble is that there will always be somebody who feels insulted and there will for some reason awalys be a group of people that jump on the wagon and will try to go out of their way to please people like that.
So I say, “people will penises” is abusive! I am special and I want that not we say “people with banana shaped organs on their bodies”, that is the only acceptable way of identifying these individuals