Internet Archive's digital library has been found in breach of copyright. The decision has some important implications

The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

https://theconversation.com/internet-archives-digital-library-has-been-found-in-breach-of-copyright-the-decision-has-some-important-implications-212091

Internet Archive's digital library has been found in breach of copyright. The decision has some important implications

The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

The Conversation
I hope all the writers who support this lawsuit understand that they are contributing to a long standing effort to outlaw libraries in general. Nobody makes direct money off of sharing things. Get ready for DRM involved in every single thing that you do.

Listen, I love libraries as much as the next person. We have very clear laws that protect libraries.

Is copyright a little fucked and a little too slanted towards those rights holders? Yes.

Did anyone really think it was OK to start adding books and movies in? And provide those for free to everyone simultaneously? Libraries don’t do that.

Libraries can do that. Okay, technically, it’s illegal, but under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, since libraries are run by political subdivisions of US states, they can’t be sued with the state’s permission which means that a state government can literally not allow the library to be sued for copyright infringement and then they’d get away with it.

The trade-off is that this probably permanently burns all bridges between the library and publishers, who would likely not want to deal with the library any more.

It’s not even technically illegal. Libraries, like you and me, are allowed to lend physical books, music CDs, and DVDs to whomever they want.

Some libraries also lend e-books, but they had to obtain permission to do so from the copyright holder, just as Netflix had to obtain permission in order to stream media.

It is fairly clear the parent isn’t a lawyer. It’s also fairly clear they have very little interaction with law in general. I’m guessing more of the sovereign citizen camp.
I’m not a sovereign citizen. This is just a point where the law isn’t fair/doesn’t work in the way that you’d expect. See the updated parent comment for sources + legal reasoning.