Okay, but can we all agree that kids shouldn’t be exposed to pornography?

Define “kids”

Oh boy……

From my post explaining the judgment in non-legalese above

4: “sweep” of law (that is, who it is designed to protect) is unclear due to widely varying harm between different levels of minors. For instance, sites that offer sex Ed to older teens would also be impacted

I’m just trying to make sure you guys agree that kids shouldn’t be exposed to pornography.

Some fucking retard is asking me to define ‘kids’ and ‘pornography’

Everyone immediately downvoting my comment of ‘you guys don’t think kids should be exposed to pornography, right?’

I think this is an important distinction. We need to start there and then we can move forward and find ways to protect them from it.

But it makes sense to make sure we are starting from the same place.

The dude asking about what kids and pornography means is probably a fucking creep

That dude is also me, and as I added to the comment, that specific difference is part of the judgment.

People are downvoting you for the same reason they disapprove of the law - your comment seems disingenuous.

I just really hate this place and the people who post here