Jordan Peterson learns that freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences

https://lemmy.ca/post/4381093

Jordan Peterson learns that freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences - Lemmy.ca

It pained me to discover that my brother liked one of his books in 2020. I’m very careful to not stress our relationship because he’s otherwise a decent person. I shudder to think what other content he might expose himself to over time and what that will mean for our relationship.

How does liking a book make your brother any less of a decent person? I assume it’s 12 Rules for Life, as that seems to be the book Peterson best know for. From Wikipedia, these are the rules. Nothing here seems vile or like something that should make you question your brothers decency.

  • “Stand up straight with your shoulders back.”
  • “Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping.”
  • “Make friends with people who want the best for you.”
  • “Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not to who someone else is today.”
  • “Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them.”
  • “Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world.”
  • “Pursue what is meaningful (not what is expedient).”
  • “Tell the truth – or, at least, don’t lie.”
  • “Assume that the person you are listening to might know something you don’t.”
  • “Be precise In Your Speech.”
  • “Do not bother children while they are skateboarding.”
  • “Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street.”
  • “Women, gays and blacks exist in a strata below white males because lobsters.”
  • I cannot understand how you folks who love to defend this cretin can overlook this utter malarkey and focus on ‘make your bed’.

    If he was as bad as you say you wouldn’t need to make stuff up or willfully misinterpret him in order to discredit him.

    People are complicated. Just because you disagree with someone on one topic doesn’t mean everything they’ve ever said is bad.

    Look at some of his old tweets. He’s racist and not as intelligent as he wants you to believe. It’s not complicated in this case.
    Ad homiem is a logical fallacy.
    It sounds like you have something in mind, why don’t you link me to it instead of sending me on a wild goose chase.
    You can look in this thread, mate. There are screenshots a few comments up or down…

    Wait. He wants us to believe that he is intelligent? I’ve known toddlers that have an easier time getting words out.

    I thought his whole shtick was portraying a bumbling idiot to appeal to the hyperemotional crazies who get worked up about people not being just so?

    Absolutely he wants to and a lot of people buy it.
    For sure. A lot may even be an understatement for how many hyperemotional crazies have bought into his schtick.